HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
Masterimage 3D, Inc. v. Reald Inc.: Denying Authorization to Terminate Proceeding in Petitioner’s Effort to Avoid Estoppel IPR2015-00035
Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Takeaway: A petitioner may seek to request judgment against itself at any time without Board authorization; however, Board authorization is required if a petitioner further seeks to terminate the proceeding without a final written decision and its accompanying estoppel effects.

In its Decision, the Board denied Petitioner’s Request for Authorization to File a Motion to Terminate trial without a final written decision. Petitioner “sought authorization to file a motion to terminate trial that would result in a judgment without a final written decision.” Petitioner sought an adverse judgment “due to Petitioner’s abandonment of the contest under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)(4), but [also] sought to avoid the estoppel effects of a final written decision.” Patent Owner opposed.

The Board first noted that “Judgment” is defined as “a final written decision by the Board, or a termination of a proceeding.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.2. “Whether a judgment is a final written decision or a termination of a proceeding depends on the circumstances.” While Board authorization is not required for a party to request judgment against itself at any time during a proceeding, including abandoning the contest, Board authorization is required if the party characterizes the adverse judgment as a termination. Here, because Petitioner requested authorization to file a motion to terminate the proceeding (in addition to stating its intent to abandon the contest), the Board had discretion to consider “whether terminating, without rendering a final written decision, is appropriate under the circumstances presented.” See 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.

In its following analysis, the Board noted that the proceeding was not in a preliminary stage and Patent Owner opposed Petitioner’s efforts to avoid estoppel. Under the circumstances, the Board denied “Petitioner’s request for authorization to file a motion to terminate, without a final written decision, based on a request for adverse judgment.”

Masterimage 3D, Inc. v. Reald Inc., IPR2015-00035
Paper 30: Decision Denying Request for Authorization
Dated: June 25, 2015
Patent: 7,857,455 B2
Before: Jameson Lee, James B. Arpin, and Bart A. Gerstenblith
Written by: Gerstenblith

HTML Embed Code
HB Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins