Twenty-six states have filed suit to challenge the emergency temporary standard regarding COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing (the “ETS”) issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) on November 4, 20201, and published in the Federal Register on November 5, 2021. Federal courts have previously held that OSHA rules are ripe for challenge when the rule is published in the Federal Register. Within hours of publication in the Federal Register, the legality of the OSHA ETS is pending in the 5th, 6th, 8th, and 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

A coalition including Missouri, Arizona, Nebraska, Montana, Arkansas, Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, Alaska, New Hampshire, Wyoming, and five additional private entities (the “Coalition”) filed suit in the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals arguing that the power to compel vaccinations rests not with the federal government, but with the states. The Coalition argues that OSHA’s ETS goes beyond workplace safety and into public health policy, which the states assert exceeds OSHA’s statutory authority. Lawsuits filed by Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Utah in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Florida, Alabama, and Georgia in the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and Kentucky, Idaho, Kansas, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and West Virginia filed in the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals similarly challenge the legality of the OSHA ETS.

Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee also filed suit challenging the Biden Administration’s mandate requiring federal contractors to be vaccinated. The lawsuit sets forth similar bases to challenge the federal contractor mandate, alleging that the police power to enforce vaccines rests with the states, not the federal government. Likewise, the states assert that the federal contractor mandate exceeds the President’s statutory authority.