Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jan
28
2017
Eighth Circuit Holds that ADA Compensatory Damages Claims Survive Employee’s Death Polsinelli PC
Jan
26
2018
Challenger Bears Burden of Proof for Unpatentability of Proposed Amended Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
23
2020
Are Whistleblowers in Virginia Eligible for Whistleblower Rewards or Bounties? Zuckerman Law
Feb
23
2021
Conflicting Prosecution Statements Can Render Claims Indefinite Finnegan
Feb
9
2023
The Ramifications of The Delaware Court of Chancery’s McDonald’s Decision – Beyond Holding That Caremark Oversight Obligations Apply to Corporate Officers Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Mar
20
2013
Tribal Gaming Revenue Sharing in California Dickinson Wright PLLC
Jun
1
2014
Only an Owner of a Patent Can Appeal Final Decisions from the PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
4
2016
Patent Office Releases Comments on Standards for Patent Eligibility Examination
Jun
3
2017
Employer No-Recording Policies May Violate NLRA Says the Second Circuit Murtha Cullina
Oct
30
2018
Court Of Chancery Judicially Validates Company's Ratification of Defective Corporate Acts, Therefore Rejecting Bid to Unwind Merger K&L Gates
Feb
1
2019
National Labor Relations Board Issues Decision Overruling Obama-Era Independent Contractor Test: What This Means For (Putative) Employers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
12
2020
Rhode Island Supreme Court Clarifies ‘Reasonable Grounds’ Standard for Employment-Based Drug Testing Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Dec
2
2020
“[Buccaneers’ counsel] is a settler”—Fascinating New COA Decision Sheds Light on the Secret Chatter and Tactics of TCPA Class Action Lawyers Troutman Amin, LLP
Jul
5
2024
Chevron Has Fallen: Supreme Court Seismically Shifts Regulatory Power From Agencies to Courts Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
21
2012
2012 Year-End Estate Planning Advisory Katten
Mar
28
2016
Lack of Clarity in Employer’s Drug Testing Policy Results in Remand to Trial Court in Unemployment Compensation Case Jackson Lewis P.C.
Mar
28
2017
Massachusetts Court Mandates Full Payment of 40B Application Fee for Complete Application Beveridge & Diamond PC
Nov
1
2017
PTO Litigation Report – November 1, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
24
2018
Three Steps Employers May Take to Avoid Liability When Transferring Employees Polsinelli PC
Sep
26
2019
Corporate Deposition — Multiple Witnesses At the Same Time? Pierce Atwood LLP
Apr
17
2020
Respirator Mask Price Gouging and Trademark Infringement? Not on 3M’s Watch Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
17
2021
SDNY: Confidentiality Agreement Impeded Investors from Whistleblowing Proskauer Rose LLP
May
19
2022
Plaintiffs’ Bar Shows Renewed Interest in COBRA Notice Litigation Jackson Lewis P.C.
Apr
29
2024
DOJ’s First Intervention in Cybersecurity FCA Qui Tam Case Signals Continued Cyber Enforcement Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Oct
21
2011
Dispelling the Myth of MERS as a "Sham" Beneficiary Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
28
2012
ERISA Fiduciary Breach for Failure to Monitor Fees Leads to $35 Million Class Action Hit Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jan
10
2014
Plaintiff Withdraws Appeal Before Ninth Circuit Can Review Order Dismissing LA Lakers Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Class Action Faegre Drinker
Sep
22
2014
Maryland Court of Appeals Holds that Inclusion of Permissive "Termination For Cause" Provisions Negates Presumption of At-Will Employment and Creates "Continuous For Cause" Contract Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins