So Anya Verkhovskaya is a nice enough lady.

I deposed her not long ago in connection with a case in which we just defeated certification literally yesterday.

But Humana is seemingly not going to be so lucky–although it is too early to tell.

In Elliot v. Humana, 2025 WL 897543 (W.D. Ky March 24, 2025) Humana moved to disqualify Anya arguing her methodology for identifying class members was not sound.

Her methodology boiled down to the following per the court’s ruling:

(1) Taking a list of phone numbers—identified by Humana’s own records—that received prerecorded calls from Humana but had told Humana that it had the wrong number;

(2) Confirming whether each number is assigned to a cellular telephone using third-party data processors to identify the names of all users associated with those phone numbers;

(3) Employing a historical reverse lookup process to retrieve related data associated with those users/phone numbers;

(4) Obtaining telephone carrier data to filter subscriber information (such as names, addresses, email addresses, subscription dates, and other plan-related information);

(5) Cross-referencing reverse lookup data against bulk telephone carrier data, obtained by carrier subpoena, to identify discrepancies; and

(6) Implementing a notice campaign using mail and email address information.

Ok.

Pretty low impact stuff. I probably would have recommended a rebuttal report (probably)– but I certainly would not wasted time with a Daubert motion here. (If you’re hoping to defeat certification by challenging the notice plan I’ve got news for you– you’re in trouble.)

So it looks like Humana may be in trouble.

The Court looked at Anya’s methodology and found no fault, which is sort of unsurprising because its kind of a straightforward process.

Now court’s have (rightly) rejected Anya’s reports in other cases where she makes a bunch of typos and offers opinions like “I just relied on somebody else to perform a scrub and assume their records were accurate and they did it right.”

Yeah, that’s not going to hold up.

But a process for identifying class members that is essentially just “find cell phone numbers in a file, send subpoenas, wait for results, send emails” is… well, child’s play.

Again, however, that SHOULDN’T be the focus of Humana’s efforts here. But… we’ll just have to wait and see how the bigger battle over certification turns out.