2024 was a busy year for state consumer data privacy laws in the United States. Seven states enacted comprehensive data privacy statutes throughout the year, and laws enacted in 2023 went into effect in Montana, Florida, Texas, and Oregon. While consumer data privacy laws are still relatively new, we are beginning to see evidence of enforcement in some states and far greater attention and resource expenditure internally from businesses working hard to determine which laws apply to their organizations and what steps are necessary to ensure compliance with similar but sometimes varying requirements across different states.
With a number of statutes enacted in recent years already in force, or taking effect in 2025, we encourage any business collecting personal data from consumers to monitor on an ongoing basis which state data privacy laws will (or already) apply to them. We update this State Data Privacy Law Round-Up article on an annual basis and maintain a dedicated website for U.S. State Consumer Privacy Laws to help our readers with this effort.
The 2024 Class: Data and Observations about Laws Passed in 20241
We have prepared summary charts below describing key features of new laws enacted in 2024 as well as laws passed the year prior in Delaware and Iowa. The charts will track applicability criteria, consumer rights, business obligations, and enforcement provisions. Like earlier consumer data privacy laws, the latest statutes are similarly structured and provide consumers with comparable rights to request information about personal data a business is collecting and to exercise greater control over how it will be used. Covered businesses will also have largely consistent obligations with respect to personal data they are collecting, though some variations require attention. Potential penalties vary somewhat but all of the new states joining the group will rely on state attorneys general offices to enforce their statutes, rather than provide consumers with a private right of action.
Like existing state consumer data privacy laws, the newer statutes establish applicability thresholds described in Table 1 for determining what are “covered businesses” subject to the applicable statute. Most of the laws follow a similar framework where a business will be subject to requirements if it processes the data of a certain number of state residents, or processes personal data of a certain number of residents (lower than the other prong) and derives a certain percentage of revenue from the sale of personal data. Notably, Nebraska opted for a different approach (without a resident and revenue threshold) but it categorically exempts small businesses, and Rhode Island includes an additional tier of applicability for internet service providers and commercial websites.
Table 1: Applicability Criteria
State / Name of Data Privacy Statute |
Date of Enactment / Effective Date |
Applicability Criteria for each Statute |
---|---|---|
IOWA
Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act (SF 262) |
Date of enactment: March 28, 2023 Effective date: |
Any individual or entity who either conducts business in Iowa or produces products or services that are targeted to the residents of Iowa; and that, during a calendar year either:
|
DELAWARE
Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act (HB 154) |
Date of enactment: September 11, 2023 Effective date: |
Entities that conduct business in Delaware or produce products or services targeted to residents of Delaware; and, during the prior calendar year:
|
NEW JERSEY
SB 332 |
Date of enactment: January 16, 2024 Effective date: |
Any business or person that produces products or services that are targeted to residents of New Jersey, and either:
|
NEW HAMPSHIRE
SB 255 |
Date of enactment: March 6, 2024 Effective date: |
Businesses or persons that conduct business in New Hampshire or produce products or services that are targeted to New Hampshire residents that:
|
KENTUCKY
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act (HB 15) |
Date of enactment: April 4, 2024 Effective date: |
Entities that conduct business in Kentucky or produce products or services that are targeted to residents of Kentucky; and during a single calendar year
|
NEBRASKA
Nebraska Data Privacy Act (LB 1074) |
Date of enactment: April 17, 2024 Effective date: |
|
MARYLAND
Maryland Online Data Privacy Act (SB 541) |
Date of enactment: May 9, 2024 Effective date: |
Any business or person that produces products or services that are targeted to residents of Maryland, and either:
|
MINNESOTA
Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (HF 4757) |
Date of enactment: May 24, 2024 Effective date: |
Entities that conduct business in Minnesota or produce products or services that are targeted to residents of Minnesota; and during a single calendar year, satisfy one of the following criteria:
|
RHODE ISLAND
Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (H 7787) |
Date of enactment: June 13, 2024 Effective date: |
|
To provide a comparative overview of requirements and enforcement provisions under these new laws, the charts below provide snapshots of consumer rights (Table 2), business obligations (Table 3), and enforcement procedures / penalties (Table 4) under the new state consumer privacy laws. Please note that the consumer rights created by these new laws are not available with respect to personal data collected from individuals acting in a commercial context (i.e., B2B) or employment context. As evidenced by the degree of uniformity in the charts, most state consumer data privacy laws have the same or similar core protections for consumers and obligations for businesses, with some sporadic outliers.
Table 2: Consumer Rights
Consumer Rights | NEBRASKA | RHODE ISLAND | MARYLAND | NEW JERSEY | NEW HAMPSHIRE | KENTUCKY | MINNESOTA | DELAWARE | IOWA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Right to confirm | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Right to access | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Right to correct | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Right to delete | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Right to portability | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
Right to opt out of sale of personal data | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Right to opt-out of profiling | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Right to opt in for sensitive data processing | Yes | Yes | No, Silent on opt in/opt out | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No, right to opt out |
Right to opt in or out the collection of precise geolocation data or voice recognition features | Yes, opt in | Yes, opt in | No, Silent on opt in/opt out | Yes, opt in | Yes, opt in | Yes, opt in | Yes, opt in | Yes, opt in | Yes, right to opt out |
The latest state consumer data privacy statutes contain substantially similar or the same business obligations, except for departures concerning providing a reasonably accessible and clear privacy notice (Rhode Island) and conducting document and data protection assessments (Iowa). Otherwise, the obligations businesses have under state consumer privacy laws are fairly consistent, which will ease the burden of these laws for businesses operating in some or all of the indicated states.
BUSINESS OBLIGATIONS | NEBRASKA | RHODE ISLAND | MARYLAND | NEW JERSEY | NEW HAMPSHIRE | KENTUCKY | MINNESOTA | DELAWARE | IOWA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Respond to consumer requests | Within 45 days (may be extended 45 days) | Within 45 days (may be extended 45 days) | Within 45 days (may be extended 45 days) | Within 45 days (may be extended 45 days) | Within 45 days (may be extended 45 days) | Within 45 days (may be extended 45 days) | Within 45 days (may be extended 45 days) | Within 45 days (may be extended 45 days) | Within 90 days (may be extended 45 days) |
Provide required information to consumers free of charge | Yes, up to 2x a year | Yes, up to 1x a year | Yes, up to 1x a year | Yes, up to 1x a year | Yes, up to 1x a year | Yes, up to 2x a year | Yes, up to 2x a year | Yes, up to 1x a year | Yes, up to 2x a year |
Authenticate requests | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Establish a process for consumers to appeal any refusal to take action | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Provide a “reasonably accessible” and clear privacy notice | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Disclose any sale of personal data or use of personal data for targeted advertising (and how to opt-out) | Yes | No2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Conduct any document data protection impact assessments for processing activities generated: | On or after January 1, 2025 | On or after January 1, 2026 | On or after October 1, 2025 | On or after January 15, 2025 | On or after July 1, 2024 | On or after June 1, 2026 | On or after July 31, 2025 | On or after July 1, 2025 | No |
Limit collection of personal data to what is adequate, relevant, and reasonably necessary in relation to the disclosed purposes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Process personal data solely for disclosed purposes or purposes compatible with disclosures, unless the consumer consents | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Do not discriminate against a consumer for exercising any consumer rights | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Obtain consent before selling or using data from users between 13 and 15 years of age for targeted advertising | No | No | Yes, from users between 13 and 18 years of age. | No | No | No | No | Yes, from users between 13 and 18 years of age. | No |
When it comes to enforcement, Maryland, New Jersey, and Delaware have higher-end maximum civil fines per violation, starting at $10,000, whereas penalties in Rhode Island are much lighter ($500 per violation). Another notable feature of these laws is the timeline for expiration of the cure period available to covered entities. Unlike many earlier statutes, newer laws (except for Kentucky) tend to terminate the cure period after a shorter period of time, after which the enforcement body retains discretion whether to provide cure opportunities. As a result businesses should be aiming to achieve compliance as soon as possible so that they are ready to comply with applicable laws from the outset.
ENFORCEMENT | NEBRASKA | RHODE ISLAND | MARYLAND | NEW JERSEY | NEW HAMPSHIRE | KENTUCKY | MINNESOTA | DELAWARE | IOWA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Private right of action | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Enforcement | Attorney General | Attorney General | Attorney General | Attorney General | Attorney General | Attorney General | Attorney General | Delaware Department of Justice | Attorney General |
Opt-in default for sensitive data (requirement age) | 13 years of age | 13 years of age | 13 years of age | 13 years of age | 13 years of age | 13 years of age | 13 years of age | 13 years of age | 13 years of age |
Right-to-cure period | 30 days | None | 60 days, cure period becomes discretionary on April 1, 2027 | 30 days, cure period becomes discretionary on July 15, 2026 | 30 days, cure period becomes discretionary on January 1, 2026 | 30 days | 30 days, cure period expires January 31, 2026 | 60 days, cure period becomes discretionary on January 1, 2026 | 90 days |
Max civil fine per violation | $7,500 | $500 | $10,000 per first time violation, $25,000 repeat violations | $10,000 per first time violation, $20,000 repeat violations | Not specified | $7,500 | $7,500 | $10,000 | $7,500 |
A note on the Connecticut Attorney General Report on Connecticut Data Privacy Act Enforcement
Earlier this year in February, Connecticut’s Attorney General (AG) William Tong released a report summarizing the enforcement efforts of the Connecticut AG’s office with respect to the Connecticut Data Privacy Act (“CTDPA”), which went into effect in July of 2023. According to the report, the Connecticut AG’s office had issued over a dozen notices of violation (“cure notices”) as well as other information requests to businesses across different industries since the law took effect. The report indicates that the Connecticut AG’s priorities included enforcement of the CTDPA’s provisions concerning privacy policies, sensitive data, and teens’ data. Businesses in all states with comprehensive data privacy laws should take note of this report and the areas of enforcement important to at least one state AG.
Looking Ahead
We expect that 2025 will bring new state data privacy laws and greater enforcement in this area, particularly in the continued absence of a federal omnibus privacy statute. We will be watching this space and look forward to sharing more updates with you about what is happening in the states. If you have any questions related to state consumer data privacy laws, please feel free to contact anyone from Mintz’s Privacy & Cybersecurity team.
ENDNOTES