Litigation Trial Practice

Custom text Title Organization
Mar
2
2017
Missouri Supreme Court Rules that St. Louis’ Minimum Wage Ordinance is Not Preempted by State Law Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Mar
2
2017
Sovereign Immunity Can Shield State University Research Foundations in PTAB Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2017
New York Appellate Division Revives Non-Monetary Class Action Settlement in M&A Class Action with Revised Standard of Review Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2017
Employee’s Failure to Immediately Report Incident Defeats Retaliation Claim Much Shelist, P.C.
Mar
2
2017
Johns Manville v. Knauf Insulation: Design Patent Survives AIA Review McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 2, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
2
2017
Valero Refining-Texas, L.P. v. Galveston Central Appraisal District: Strategic Opportunity? K&L Gates
Mar
2
2017
TTAB Serves It Straight Up: TEQUILA Is Not Generic McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2017
Less Utility Than Alternatives Does Not Make Product’s Trade Dress Protectable McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2017
How Federal Courts and Michigan Courts View Pending Motions for Attorney Fees on Finality of Judgment Dickinson Wright PLLC
Mar
1
2017
Proposed Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017 Seeks to Curb Attorney Abuses of Class Action Device and Expand Class Action Defendant Protections K&L Gates
Mar
1
2017
Hydro Newsletter- March 1, 2017: Bull Trout ESA Case Dismissed, Reinitiation of Consultation Moots ESA Section 7(a)(2) Claims; FERC Delegates Additional Authority to Staff to Act during Absence of Quorum; Van Ness Feldman LLP
Mar
1
2017
Call-In Procedures and Intermittent FMLA Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
1
2017
35 U.S.C. §271 (f)(1) Substantial Component: Quantity over Quality Vedder Price
Mar
1
2017
Blowin' in the Wind? The Evolution of a Balanced Analysis of Workplace Policies by the NLRB Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Mar
1
2017
Federal Circuit Orders Google Patent Case Transferred from E.D. Tex. Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
1
2017
Web Page Authentication Patent is Outside the Scope of CBM Review Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
1
2017
Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness Cap on Obviousness Showing McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Carefully Consider the Scope of Releases When Settling Claims between Family-Business Owners Murtha Cullina
Mar
1
2017
Keeping Up with the Kardashians’ Attempt to Compel Trademark Arbitration McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 1, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
1
2017
Lanham Act Cannot Be Used to Create “Species of Mutant Copyright Law” McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Digital Evidence and Privacy: Can you ask Alexa if Mom’s Incapacitated? Holland & Hart LLP
Mar
1
2017
Application Partially Voided Where Defendant Lacked Bona Fide Intent to Use Mark McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Federal Circuit Reminds PTAB to Explain its Reasoning Mintz
Mar
1
2017
EEOC Subpoena Rejected by Tenth Circuit Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
1
2017
Patent Owner and Counsel to Pay Double Costs for Frivolous Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Article III Injury-in-Fact Required to Appeal PTAB Final Written Decision in IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
What The Delaware Supreme Court Overlooked In Gantler v. Stephens Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Mar
1
2017
Not Intuitively Obvious: Federal Circuit Remands for Explicit Rational to Combine McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
NLRB Acting Chair Dissents Point to Likely Changes to Board Election Rules and Employee Handbook and Email Standards Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Mar
1
2017
U.S. Airways Vs. Sabre: 3 Ways To Prove Healthy Market Competition IMS Legal Strategies
Mar
1
2017
Remand to District Court to Attempt to Identify “Article of Manufacture” for Design Patent Damages McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Federal Circuit Finds Drug Does Not Satisfy Markush Group Requirements; Reverses District Court Finding of Infringement Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
1
2017
Federal Circuit Finds Standing to Appeal Reexamination Decisions Even Though Reexamination Requestor Had Not Been Sued For Infringement Hunton Andrews Kurth
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins