HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
FAA Preempts Latest California Anti-Arbitration Statute
Thursday, August 22, 2024

Hernandez v. Sohnen Enterprises, Inc., 102 Cal. App. 5th 222 (2024)

In this decision, the Court of Appeal held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1281.97, which requires that an employer pay (and the arbitrator receive) all arbitration fees that are owed within 30 days or face an automatic “waiver” of the right to arbitrate. The Court relied in part upon Justice John Shepard Wiley Jr.’s spirited dissent in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court, 99 Cal. App. 5th 1319 (2024) (review granted). Likely the most important takeaway from Hernandez is that employers should confirm that their arbitration agreement expressly states that it is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. Failure to invoke the FAA may mean that the more employee-friendly (and arbitration-hostile) California Arbitration Act (including Section 1281.97) will apply. Compare Keeton v. Tesla, Inc., 103 Cal. App. 5th 26 (2024) (disagreeing with Hernandez and holding that Section 1281.98 is not unconstitutional, noting that “Hernandez is distinguishable [from Keeton] because the arbitration agreement in that case specifically said it was governed by the FAA”).

HTML Embed Code
HB Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins