/>iFind this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.
Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other
- In one case challenging a Utah bill, the plaintiff filed a notice of supplemental authority and the government filed a response to the notice of supplemental authority.
- In two cases challenging a Nebraska bill, the court granted the government’s unopposed motion to consolidate the cases. In one case, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint.
- In one case challenging a Missouri bill, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief.
- In a case challenging an Arkansas state law, the drug manufacturer filed a sealed motion for summary judgment.
- In a case by a covered entity against an insurance company alleging breach of contract, the insurance company filed a reply in support of its motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
- In four cases challenging Oregon, Maine, and Oklahoma state laws governing contract pharmacy arrangements:
- Oklahoma: In one case, the defendant filed a response in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and in another case, the plaintiff filed a reply in support of its motion for preliminary injunction and a group of amici filed an amicus curiae brief in support of defendant.
- Oregon: The plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction.
- Maine: The plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction.
