Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Apr
25
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 25, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
22
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 22, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
22
2016
Federal Circuit Holds Construction of Design Patents Must Include Functional Elements that Contribute to the Design’s Overall Ornamentation Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
22
2016
India Patent Office Decision Denying Cipla’s Patent Application for an Anti-Retroviral Combination Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
22
2016
Can Foreign Sales Infringe U.S. Patents? Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
21
2016
Boston Scientific Corporation v. UAB Research Foundation: Request For Rehearing Granted and IPR Instituted IPR2015-00918 Faegre Drinker
Apr
21
2016
Old Republic General Insurance Group, Inc., et al. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Institution of CBM Review Denied CBM2015-00184 Faegre Drinker
Apr
21
2016
Will There Finally Be Federal Private Right of Action for Trade Secret Misappropriation? Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Apr
21
2016
Should You Be Wary of Overzealous Use of Trade Secret Claims? Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Apr
21
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 21, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
21
2016
Are Courts Still Willing to “Blue Pencil” Overbroad Restrictive Covenants to Make Them Enforceable? Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Apr
21
2016
Amneal's IPR Challenge Of Jazz Xyrem + Valproate Patent Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
21
2016
In Today’s Environment, What Is “Adequate Consideration” for a Restrictive Covenant Signed by an Existing Employee? Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Apr
20
2016
Formal Logic Reveals Hidden Dangers of Logical Fallacies in Patent Claim Rejections Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
20
2016
When Best Defense is Federal Cause of Action: Trade Secret Owners May Soon Have Federal Cause of Action for Trade Secret Misappropriation Bracewell LLP
Apr
20
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 20, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
20
2016
Europe – When is Hyperlinking Lawful? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
20
2016
Patent Infringement: 'Trump Win' Theory Comes in Says the Playtex Playbook IMS Legal Strategies
Apr
19
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 19, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
19
2016
Federal Trade Secrets Act Passes Senate Bracewell LLP
Apr
18
2016
Limelight Networks v. Akamai Tech. – Supreme Court Cert. Denied Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
18
2016
Ubisoft, Inc. v. Guitar Apprentice, Inc.: Final Written Decision Revising Previous “Means” Construction In View of Williamson v. Citrix IPR2015-00298 Faegre Drinker
Apr
18
2016
Securus Tech., Inc. v. Global Tel*Link Corp.: Final Written Decision Finding Insufficient Articulated Reasoning Presented in Support of Obviousness Grounds IPR2015-00155 Faegre Drinker
Apr
18
2016
Protections Afforded by EU Trade Secrets Directive Proskauer Rose LLP
Apr
18
2016
Europe – ‘Yes’ vote for Trade Secrets Directive Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
18
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 18, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
18
2016
Jazz Xyrem + Valproate Patent Claims Avoid IPR Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
16
2016
BioDelivery Sciences Int’l, Inc. v. Monosol RX, LLC, Collateral Estoppel Based on Ex Parte Reexam Found Not Applicable in Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Apr
15
2016
Key Lessons from Patent Litigation for Drafting and Prosecuting Utility Patent Applications Mintz
Apr
15
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 15, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
14
2016
IBG LLC, et al. v. Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc.: Extension of Time to Submit Supplemental Evidence Denied Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
EU Updates Community Trade Mark System, Warns of Potential Imposters Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
14
2016
GoPro v. Contour IP Holding: Denying Motion to Submit Declaration as Supplemental Information Where Declaration Constituted Supplemental Evidence IPR2015-01078 Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
Core Survival v. S&S Precision: Denial of Petitioner’s Rehearing Request for Raising New Unpatentability Arguments PGR2015-00022 Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
Square v. Protegrity Corp: CBM2014-00182 Challenged Claims Unpatentable Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins