Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Nov
30
2016
Upcoming Changes to Italy’s Biosimilar Landscape Covington & Burling LLP
Nov
29
2016
Not All Repeat Infringer Policies Are Sufficient for Safe Harbor Protection McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2016
Federal Circuit Clarifies What Constitutes Use “In Commerce” Under the Lanham Act Mintz
Nov
29
2016
Termination of Distribution Agreement Does Not Affect Licenses to Cloud-Based Access McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2016
“Who’s on First?” Routine in Broadway Play Strikes Out as Transformative Fair Use Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Nov
29
2016
Eleventh Circuit Shoots Down Firearms Retailer’s Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2016
Update on Patentability of Diagnostic Claims: Canada Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Nov
29
2016
Trademark Infringement: Amazon.com Does Not Have to Put Out the Fire McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 29, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
29
2016
Ninth Circuit Joins Octane Fitness Trend for Trademark Cases McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2016
PTAB Reverses Obviousness Finding After Remand: Corning Optical Communications RF, LLC v. PPC Broadband, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2016
PTAB Uses § 315(e)(1) Estoppel to Narrow IPR Scope McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2016
The Australian Patent Office Once Again Allows Claims Directed to Nucleic Acids K&L Gates
Nov
28
2016
Federal Circuit Enforces Statutory Definition of Covered Business Method Patents in Unwired Planet v. Google Armstrong Teasdale
Nov
28
2016
Patents – A Novel and Inventive Approach to Brexit? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
28
2016
Disclaimer of Financial Claims May Avoid Eligibility for CBM Review McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2016
Reconsideration of Institution Decisions Is Also “Final and Nonappealable” McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 28, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
28
2016
Hard to Reverse Adverse PTAB Rulings Under Substantial Evidence Standard McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2016
Poly-America v. API Industries: Disavowal of Claim Scope in Trash Bag Patent McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2016
Exercising "Control" Over Use of a Trade Mark in Australia - Use It or Lose It K&L Gates
Nov
27
2016
Prosecution History Disclaimer of Claim Scope Must Be “Clear and Unambiguous” in View of the Prosecution History as a Whole McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
26
2016
Evolving Post-Alice Law on Patent Eligibility McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
24
2016
Proposed “Patent Agent Privilege” Promises Protection For Patent Practitioners And Clients Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
23
2016
PTAB’s Definition of CBM Patent is Wrong and Too Broad, Federal Circuit Says Mintz
Nov
23
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 23, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
22
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 22, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
22
2016
USPTO’s Public Roundtables on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Off to Promising Start Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
22
2016
Thanksgiving Patent Special: Turkey In Every Patent Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
22
2016
Federal Circuit Corrects PTAB’s “Too Exacting” Diligence Standard Mintz
Nov
21
2016
Federal Attack on Non-Competes Likely Another Casualty of Election Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
21
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 21, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
21
2016
Basics of Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Nov
19
2016
PTAB Rules Dealer Show Catalog Fails to Qualify as Prior Art Hunton Andrews Kurth
Nov
18
2016
Intellectual Ventures Petitions Federal Circuit for Full Court Review Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins