Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Oct
4
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 4, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
3
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 3, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
3
2017
September – Commercial and IP Development Update Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
3
2017
The European Trade Mark Reform -- Phase 2 K&L Gates
Oct
3
2017
Federal Circuit Schools USPTO On Broadest Reasonable Claim Construction Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
2
2017
THE LATEST: Integra Forced to Divest Neurosurgical Tools to Gain FTC Clearance McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
Inconsistent PTAB Findings Lead to Error McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
Federal Circuit Avoids Addressing Joinder, Questions Expanded Panel Use McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
Reliance on Inherency in Obviousness Analysis: Not Cool McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 2, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
2
2017
Federal Circuit Issues Rare Reversal of PTAB IPR Decision Confirming Patent Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
PTAB Abused Discretion in Refusal to Consider Late-Breaking Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
PTAB Must Articulate Factual Basis for Obviousness Determination McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2017
Argument for Divided Infringement Goes Off the Rails McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2017
No Right to a Jury for Award of Attorneys’ Fees McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2017
No Right to Discovery of Unidentified Patents During BPCIA Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2017
Supreme Court Decides That the First Amendment Trumps the Denial of Protection for “Disparaging” Trademarks Davis|Kuelthau, s.c.
Sep
30
2017
Subpoenas on Customers Blocked in MRI Patent Case Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
29
2017
Negative Limitations in a Patent Claim – Broad or Narrow? Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
29
2017
AFCP 2.0 and QPIDS Pilot Programs Extended by USTPO Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
29
2017
PTO Litigation Report – September 29, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
29
2017
Panduit Prevents Apportioning the Profit Pie McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2017
Recap on Design Patent Drawings Mintz
Sep
29
2017
Software Claims Reflecting Technical Improvement Pass § 101 Muster McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2017
PTAB Warns Petitioners That Follow-On Petitions Will Face Additional Scrutiny Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Sep
28
2017
Interim Adverse Judgment Rule Averts Malicious Prosecution Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2017
Innovation Patents as Strategic Tools [VIDEO] K&L Gates
Sep
28
2017
PTO Litigation Report – September 28, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
28
2017
No Fairytale Ending for Unauthorized Movie Streaming McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
27
2017
“In Light of the Specification”: Federal Circuit Weighs in on the Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Mintz
Sep
27
2017
Making the Sausage: Lower Courts Grapple With the Supreme Court’s TC Heartland Venue Decision Mintz
Sep
27
2017
PTO Litigation Report – September 27, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
26
2017
Pharma Giants in Antitrust Pricing Lawsuit over Biosimilars ArentFox Schiff LLP
Sep
26
2017
Federal Circuit Rejects Eastern District of Texas Venue Test Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
26
2017
PTO Litigation Report – September 26, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins