Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Apr
29
2020
COVID-19 Impacts on the Copyright Office: What Does It Mean for Mergers and Acquisitions? Faegre Drinker
Apr
28
2020
Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances Comes into Force in China Today, April 28, 2020 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
28
2020
Supreme Court Update: Romag Fasteners v. Fossil (No. 18-1233), County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund (No. 18-260), Barton v. Barr (No. 18-725) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Apr
28
2020
Supreme Court Harmonizes Circuit Courts: Willfulness Not a Prerequisite to Recovery of Defendant’s Profits in Lanham Act Cases . . . But It Can’t Hurt Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Apr
28
2020
The Availability of Section 1782 Discovery in International Commercial Arbitration: A View from Northern California and the Epicenter of IP Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
28
2020
Adjusting to Alice: USPTO’s View of Its Examination Guidelines Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
28
2020
US Supreme Court Rules Georgia's Official Annotated Code Outside the Scope of Copyright Protection Under "Government Edicts" Doctrine K&L Gates
Apr
28
2020
Federal Circuit Finds Medical Device Claims Eligible For Patenting At Alice Step One Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
27
2020
Supreme Court Rules Showing Willfulness Not Required for Award of Profits Davis|Kuelthau, s.c.
Apr
27
2020
Supreme Court Update: Ramos v. Louisiana (No. 18-5924), Atlantic Richfield v. Christian (No. 17-1498), Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies (No. 18-916) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Apr
27
2020
Should Brands Alter Their Ads in Light of COVID-19? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
27
2020
Patent Strategies For Expedited Chinese Approval Of Medical Devices Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
27
2020
Georgia’s Loss is the Public’s Gain: Supreme Court Says States May Not Copyright Legal Codes Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
27
2020
Adjusting to Alice: USPTO Report analyzes patent examination outcomes after Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
27
2020
Supreme Court: Profit Disgorgement Available Remedy For Trademark Infringement, Willful Or Not McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
27
2020
When Winning Isn’t Prevailing—the Federal Circuit Explains Vedder Price
Apr
27
2020
Supreme Court: Willfulness Not a Requirement for Loss of Profits in Trademark Infringement Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
26
2020
Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? No, it’s an Infringement of a Reputable Mark! K&L Gates
Apr
26
2020
Kraft v Bega: Australian Appeal Court Decision Reaffirms the Perils of Relying on Unregistered Trade Mark Rghts K&L Gates
Apr
26
2020
Chinese Rail System for Restaurant Meal Delivery Patent Infringed Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2020
China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate Issues Top Example Cases of Criminal Intellectual Property Rights Infringement in 2019 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
24
2020
It’s A Snap: Supreme Court Rules that Trademark Owners can Recover Infringer’s Profits without Proving that Infringement was Willful Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
24
2020
U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Profits Available Even from Non-Willful Trademark Infringers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
24
2020
Supreme Court Preserves Availability of Profits Award for Both “Willful” and “Innocent” Trademark Infringement Pierce Atwood LLP
Apr
24
2020
U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Categorical Rule That Trademark Infringement Must Be “Willful” to Award Infringer’s Profits in Romag v. Fossil Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
24
2020
U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Willfulness Prerequisite for Disgorgement of Profits Award Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
24
2020
Chinese Trademark Office Warns Applicants Against Fraudulent Mail Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
24
2020
Willfulness Not a Prerequisite for Trademark Infringer’s Profits Bracewell LLP
Apr
24
2020
Your Color-Based Product Packaging Mark Might Be Protectable Trade Dress Hunton Andrews Kurth
Apr
24
2020
Free Extensions Of Time From IP Australia And IPONZ For COVID-19 Delays K&L Gates
Apr
24
2020
“Consisting Essentially Of” Decision at Federal Circuit Supports Link between Specification and Claims in Composition Patents Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
24
2020
Chinese Trademark Office Issues FAQ on Collective and Certification Trademark Registration Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
23
2020
Sharing IP Rights in the Fight Against COVID-19 Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Apr
23
2020
Claims Need Only Inform a Skilled Artisan of the Metes and Bounds with Reasonable Certainty McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
23
2020
No Disgorgement When Injunction is Sufficient Remedy McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins