Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jul
6
2020
Judge Albright to Apple: Yes, You Can Be Sued Outside Northern California Mintz
Jul
6
2020
USPTO Announces Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
3
2020
Apply Now for the EUIPO Trade Mark and Design Education Programme Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
3
2020
Supreme Court Update: Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue; U.S. Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com; Nestlé USA v. Doe I; Cargill v. Doe I; Department of Justice v. House Committee on the Judiciary Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jul
3
2020
Fifth Episode of Patent Analytics Webinar Series Discusses FTO Mapping [VIDEO] Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
2
2020
Generic + Generic = Protectable? The Supreme Court Opens Door for Generic Terms Combined with Generic Domain Suffixes to be Registrable in Booking.Com Decision Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
2
2020
Motion to Add Willful Infringement Charge Based Entirely on Post-Suit Activity Is Granted…Because It Is Unopposed Mintz
Jul
2
2020
Proving Abandonment: How Trademark Rights Can Be Lost Through Non-Use Stark & Stark
Jul
2
2020
USPTO Extends Certain Reliefs under CARES Act for Small and Micro Entities Polsinelli PC
Jul
2
2020
In Booking.com Decision, the U.S. Supreme Court Holds Generic Website Names That Have Acquired Secondary Meaning May Be Registered as Trademarks Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jul
1
2020
U.S. Supreme Court Concludes That In Trademark Registration, The Customer Is King (Or Queen) Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
1
2020
Booking.Com Secures Key Trademark Win From Supreme Court – Internet Domain Name Marks Aren’t Always Generic Polsinelli PC
Jul
1
2020
USPTO Announces New Pilot Program to Expedite Appeals Process Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
1
2020
U.S. Supreme Court Cancels USPTO’s Reservations About Registering Booking.com Brand Name Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
1
2020
Improper Use of Voluntarily Communicated Trade Secrets Sufficient to Maintain Action for Misappropriation in Texas McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
1
2020
Should I File for My Trademark + '.COM?' It Depends Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jul
1
2020
More Than a Feeling: No Fees for Frivolous Claim Where “Perceived Wrongs Were Deeply Felt” McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
1
2020
German Competition Authority Files Amicus Brief in SEP Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
1
2020
Damages Award Crumbles in Texas Concrete Manufacturing Row McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
1
2020
Class of End-Payors Certified in Illegal Monopolization Suit Against Drug Maker Allergan MoginRubin
Jul
1
2020
Copyright Office Issues Report on DMCA Safe Harbors: Section 512 is “Unbalanced” Faegre Drinker
Jul
1
2020
Amazon Seller Hit with Sanctions in Lanham Act Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
1
2020
U.S. Supreme Court Allows Booking.com to Trademark Its Domain Name K&L Gates
Jun
30
2020
Supreme Court Upholds Booking.com Trademark Registration Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
30
2020
Federal Circuit Focuses On Active Ingredient, Not Active Moiety, For Scope Of Patent Term Extension Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
29
2020
Defendant in China Wind Turbine Trade Secret Theft Case Sentenced to 3-Year Prison Term Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
29
2020
What You and Your Business Need to Know About Copyright Law and Infringement Stark & Stark
Jun
29
2020
The “Perfect Storm”: COVID-19 and Trade Secret Litigation [VIDEO] Mintz
Jun
26
2020
COVID-19 Update – Prioritized Examination Program for Certain Trademark Applications at the United States Patent and Trademark Office Polsinelli PC
Jun
25
2020
Google v. Oracle and the Future of Software Development Vedder Price
Jun
25
2020
US Trademark Office Waives/Refunds Fees for Reviving Applications and Registrations Abandoned Due to COVID-19 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jun
25
2020
Federal Circuit Partially Rejects Appeal as Based on Non-Final Judgments McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
25
2020
Shifting “Sands”: New Facts on the Ground Justify Institution of a Previously-Denied IPR Mintz
Jun
25
2020
Where Claimed Points of Novelty Have Primarily Functional Purpose, They Fail “Ornamental Design” Patentability Requirement McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
24
2020
No Hiding from § 317(b): Collateral Agreements Referenced in IPR Termination Agreement Must Be Disclosed McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins