| May 20 2020 |
Third Circuit Rules Class Action Wage Claim Should be Arbitrated Under Franchise Agreement |
Stark & Stark |
| Apr 30 2020 |
Illinois’ New COVID-19 Shelter-in-Place Order: Top 10 Changes Employers Need to Know |
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. |
| Apr 3 2020 |
CARES Act Paycheck Protection Program: What Franchisors and Franchisees Need to Know |
Polsinelli PC |
| Mar 3 2020 |
Time Is Money: A Quick Wage-Hour Tip on … Joint Employer Status Under the Fair Labor Standards Act |
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. |
| Feb 11 2020 |
California Office of Tax Appeals Upholds Taxpayer Friendly "Drop and Swap" Case |
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP |
| Feb 3 2020 |
DBO Website Lists Central Locations For Service Of Process |
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP |
| Jan 22 2020 |
Brazil’s New Legal Framework for Franchising |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Jan 22 2020 |
January 2020 AB 5 Update: The California Supreme Court Will Likely Decide if Dynamex Is Retro in 2020 |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Jan 21 2020 |
Department of Labor Clarifies that Franchising Does Not Make Joint-Employer Status More Likely under FLSA |
Polsinelli PC |
| Jan 20 2020 |
Saracens’ relegation and the knock-on effects |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
| Jan 13 2020 |
Jägerbomb: An Intoxicatingly Accidental Franchise |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Jan 13 2020 |
Bank On It: Seventh Circuit Decision Turns On Investments In The Dealership |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Jan 13 2020 |
Beware The Repeat Player: Ninth Circuit Vacates Arbitration Award For “Evident Partiality” |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Jan 13 2020 |
The Cost of a Handshake: Federal Case Highlights the Trouble and Expense of Litigating Unwritten Agreements |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Jan 13 2020 |
Limits to the WFDL: Distributor Must Honor Forum Selection Clause |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Nov 18 2019 |
Texas Magistrate Denies Motion for Attorneys’ Fees Incurred in Seeking Confirmation of Arbitration Award |
Carlton Fields |
| Nov 4 2019 |
Weekly IRS Roundup October 28 – November 1, 2019 |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 28 2019 |
How Can Brand Owners and Retailers Proactively Manage Their Property Portfolio Costs? [VIDEO] |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
| Sep 26 2019 |
A Dark Day for Franchising: Ninth Circuit Reinstates its Misguided Vazquez Decision, Undermining the Franchise Business Model |
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner |
| Sep 24 2019 |
AB5 Update: California Legislature Seeks Shake-Up of Gig Economy; Any Impact of CA Independent Contractor Laws on Franchisors Remains Unclear |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Sep 20 2019 |
California Statute Offers Dramatic Change to Independent Contractor, Franchise-Franchisee Relationships |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Sep 3 2019 |
After Reviewing the Arbitration Record, Court Enters Default Judgment Confirming Default Arbitration Award |
Carlton Fields |
| Aug 13 2019 |
Don’t Feel Bad for Protecting Your Franchise and Trademark Rights |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Aug 5 2019 |
Maryland Federal Court Denies Untimely Request to Vacate Arbitration Award |
Carlton Fields |
| Mar 14 2019 |
THE LATEST: DOJ Distinguishes ‘No-Poach’ Agreements |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Mar 11 2019 |
Texas Supreme Court Closes the Door to Transactional Fraud Claims Based on False Representations That Conflict With an Agreement’s Express Terms |
Polsinelli PC |
| Jan 13 2019 |
The Illinois Franchise Tax |
Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered |
| Oct 24 2018 |
National Labor Relations Board Released Proposed Rule to Undo Browning-Ferris |
Stark & Stark |
| Sep 24 2018 |
Antitrust Scrutiny of No-Poaching Agreements Continues to Pick Up Steam |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Sep 24 2018 |
Recent Decision Questions Use of No-Poach Clauses in Franchise Agreements |
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. |
| Sep 19 2018 |
Franchisors Face Class Action Lawsuits & Government Enforcement over “No-Poach” Agreements |
Stark & Stark |
| Sep 14 2018 |
National Labor Relations Board Proposes New Joint-Employer Rule |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
| Sep 14 2018 |
Here we go again: NLRB Announces Proposed Rule to Restore Traditional Joint-Employer Standard |
Polsinelli PC |
| Sep 14 2018 |
NLRB Proposed Rule Will Redefine Joint-Employer Status –Rule Will Overrule Browning-Ferris and Require “Direct and Immediate Control” |
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. |
| Sep 14 2018 |
NLRB releases draft joint employer rule rolling back Browning-Ferris |
Barnes & Thornburg LLP |
