Apr 21 2016 |
Is Evidence of Juror Bias in Deliberations Admissible? Supreme Court to Decide |
Proskauer Rose LLP |
Apr 20 2016 |
Did the FCA’s “Implied Certification” Theory Dodge a Bullet? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 20 2016 |
Update on Deference to IRS Positions |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
Apr 20 2016 |
How a Supreme Court Vacancy Actually Works and Its Implications Part 1 of 2 |
The National Law Review / The National Law Forum LLC |
Apr 18 2016 |
You’ve Got Damage from a Construction Defect – How Do You Know How Much Invasive Testing is Sufficient? |
Stark & Stark |
Apr 18 2016 |
California Court May Not Employ Alan Funt Tactics To Assess Attorney-Client Privilege |
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP |
Apr 15 2016 |
Introducing the New SmartExpert: Self-driving Car "Drivers" |
IMS Legal Strategies |
Apr 14 2016 |
Seventh Circuit Rejects Plaintiffs’ Chain-of-Causation Theory of Personal Jurisdiction |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
Apr 14 2016 |
Connecticut Supreme Court Limits Right to Trial By Jury: Waive Goodbye to Juries |
Murtha Cullina |
Apr 13 2016 |
Dispositive Motions in Sheep’s Clothing: Decision Every New Jersey Practitioner Needs to Know |
Sills Cummis & Gross P.C. |
Apr 4 2016 |
Tax Court Amends Evidence Rules |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
Apr 4 2016 |
In California, Mayhem May Not Be What You See On Television |
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP |
Apr 4 2016 |
USPTO Issues New Rules For PTAB Proceedings |
Faegre Drinker |
Mar 31 2016 |
March 2016 Amendments to Federal Circuit Rules of Practice |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
Mar 30 2016 |
Patent Agent-Client Privilege: Smartclause? |
IMS Legal Strategies |
Mar 29 2016 |
Attacking Class Action Allegations On The Pleadings Can Be A Successful Strategy |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 29 2016 |
Cook IVC Court’s Utilization of Case Management Plans and Case Management Orders to Guide and Control Multidistrict Litigation |
Stark & Stark |
Mar 24 2016 |
North Carolina - The Ready-Made Suit of Standing |
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP |
Mar 22 2016 |
Compromising and Settling of Derivative Suits In California |
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP |
Mar 22 2016 |
Federal Circuit Finds Personal Jurisdiction Based On Plans To Market ANDA Product |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
Mar 21 2016 |
Sanctions for Failing to Investigate Insurance under Federal Rule 26 |
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP |
Mar 21 2016 |
Delaware Judges Double Down on Boomerang Ruling Solidifying it as Law of Delaware |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
Mar 17 2016 |
U.S. Supreme Court: For Federal Diversity Jurisdiction Purposes, Trust Takes Citizenship of Members When Sued in Trust’s Name |
Jackson Lewis P.C. |
Mar 16 2016 |
Emergency Medicine Expert Can Be Qualified to Offer Opinions as to Deviations by Emergency Room Nurses |
Stark & Stark |
Mar 15 2016 |
Issue Preclusion Applied to Priority Dispute at TTAB |
Katten |
Mar 15 2016 |
Will Supreme Court Put Brakes on False Claims Act Litigation? |
Faegre Drinker |
Mar 10 2016 |
Wiretapping: Watch What You Write, Watch What You Say |
Barnes & Thornburg LLP |
Mar 10 2016 |
New York Court Rules Rule 67 Deposit Cannot be Used to Pick Off Named Plaintiffs in Putative Diet Pill Class |
Proskauer Rose LLP |
Mar 7 2016 |
Conclusion to 14 Part Series on Document Culling |
Jackson Lewis P.C. |
Mar 4 2016 |
Objections to Document Demands Under Amended Rule 34 |
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP |
Mar 3 2016 |
Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Asbestos Defendant for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction |
Steptoe & Johnson PLLC |
Mar 3 2016 |
In Daubert Ruling Excluding Both Parties’ Damages Experts, Judge Andrews Rejects FRAND Portfolio Rate as Ceiling on Reasonable Royalty, and Finds Use of Surveys Not Properly Tied to Relevant Technology |
Mintz |
Feb 29 2016 |
Equitable Considerations under First-to-File Rule |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
Feb 28 2016 |
Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Plaintiff’s Voluntary Dismissal Tactic |
ArentFox Schiff LLP |
Feb 25 2016 |
Supreme Court Finds an Unaccepted Offer for Complete Relief Does Not Moot Individual or Class Claims, But Leaves the Door Ajar |
Barnes & Thornburg LLP |