Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Sep
30
2009
The Art Of Litigation – Part I
Apr
20
2016
How a Supreme Court Vacancy Actually Works and Its Implications Part 1 of 2
Jun
1
2009
Wyeth v. Levine: Where Do We Go From Here?
Jun
2
2009
Law and Practice: The Consumer Products Safety Improvement Act Of 2008
Jun
2
2009
Hydrogen Peroxide: The Third Circuit’s “Acid Test” For Class Certification
Jun
2
2009
A Group Approach To Coping With The Subprime Mortgage Crisis
Aug
25
2009
Stopping CERCLA Liability In Its Tracks? Supreme Court Limits Joint And Several Liability, Narrows Arranger Liability
Feb
22
2011
Caution: Discussions between Counsel and Client during a Deposition May Not Be Privileged
Jun
4
2009
A Paper Tiger: The Reclaiming Seller In Bankruptcy
Jun
5
2009
Key Answers To Your E-Discovery Questions
Jun
5
2009
Roundtable: Part I – Corporate Internal Investigations: Early Stages
May
3
2016
Scalia’s Supreme Court Vacancy - Impact on the 5th Circuit and Circuit Court Splits Part 2 of 2
Jun
5
2009
Roundtable: Part II – Corporate Internal Investigations: Later Stages
Apr
13
2016
Dispositive Motions in Sheep’s Clothing: Decision Every New Jersey Practitioner Needs to Know
Oct
4
2012
Important Employment Legislative Developments Impacting Both NY and NJ Employers Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Mar
31
2011
Jury Trials In New Jersey: The Impact of Modern Technology on Jury Requests to “Read-Back” Trial Testimony Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Jul
26
2012
The Latest, but Perhaps Not Last, Word on the Pleading Requirements for Direct and Indirect Infringement Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Jun
29
2012
Willful Infringement Will Now Be Harder to Prove Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Sep
6
2012
The Rise and Possible Fall of Class Actions in False Advertising Litigation Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Jun
22
2015
Take Practical Steps Now to Ease the Burden of E-Discovery in the Future Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Mar
11
2011
New Jersey’s Appellate Division: Failure to Prove Emotional Distress Damages and Failure to Prove Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Does Not Necessarily Foreclose Punitive Damages under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
May
19
2012
The Perils of Internet Research by Jurors Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
May
29
2009
Supreme Court Decides Exhaustion and Evidence Cases Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Dec
2
2012
The New Jersey Appellate Division Addresses Rent Receiver Liability Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Dec
15
2009
The Art Of Litigation – Part II Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
May
19
2012
Kendall v. Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. – The Interplay between the New Jersey Product Liability Act's Presumption of Adequacy for FDA-Approved Warnings and the Discovery Rule in Evaluating a Statue of Limitations Defense Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Oct
28
2015
Target Discovery Ruling Sheds Light on Preserving Privilege of Post-Breach Internal Investigations Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Nov
12
2010
Cornett v. Johnson & Johnson - New Jersey's Appellate Court Applies Riegel and Buckman to a State Common Law Product Liability Claim Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Feb
23
2011
Employers Beware of Conducting Self-Evaluative Assessments of Compliance with Employment Laws: HR Tip of the Month Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Aug
5
2011
U.S. Supreme Court Reverses New Jersey’s Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturer Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Aug
28
2012
The Federal Circuit Will Decide if a Damages Trial or Decision on Willfulness Is Required Before a Judgment of Patent Infringement Can Be Appealed Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Nov
13
2012
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Does Not Dive into the Turbulent Waters of the Supreme Court’s Stream of Commerce Debate Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Jul
3
2012
The Dangers of Waiting Too Long to Request Return of Inadvertently Produced Privileged Information Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Mar
4
2015
New Jersey Supreme Court Bars Ex Parte Judicial Communication with Jurors Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Oct
18
2023
Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. – The United States Supreme Court Upholds Consent-Based Theory of General Jurisdiction Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins