Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
3
2013
Fourth Circuit Affirms Finding of No Fifth Amendment Violation in Connection with 45-Year Conviction for $100 Million Investment Scheme Katten
May
10
2013
A First for Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND): Federal Court in Microsoft v. Motorola Sets FRAND Royalty Rates for Standard Essential Patents McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
27
2014
Supreme Court Decides Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. Katten
Oct
14
2015
Still Waters: Sixth Circuit Issues Nationwide Stay Against “Waters of the US” Rule Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
10
2015
Ho-Ho-Hold On Just A Second: Employer “Dos” and “Don’ts” for Holiday Parties ArentFox Schiff LLP
Apr
22
2016
New York Court Enforces Forum Selection Clause in ERISA Plan Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
2
2017
California Auto Accident Claims Involving Marijuana Steven M. Sweat, APC
Oct
14
2020
Chinese Patent Prosecution Flow Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
15
2022
Big Lie Could Mean Big Trouble for Fox News in Defamation Case ArentFox Schiff LLP
Nov
29
2022
California Court of Appeal Limits the Permissibility of Time Rounding Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
2
2023
Supreme Court Holds Warhol’s “Orange Prince” Not Transformative, Not Fair Use Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
23
2024
A New Supreme Court Case Could Take a Toll on Copyright Trolls Robinson & Cole LLP
Dec
4
2019
Fifth Circuit: Procedural Win Is Not Grounds for Attorney’s Fees Proskauer Rose LLP
Apr
29
2020
Delaware Court of Chancery Addresses Pleading ‘With Particularity’ Under Rule 23.1 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
3
2012
Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Marbury Lives! Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
25
2014
Everyone Gets To See The Evidence: The California Court Of Appeal Rejects an Attorneys’ Fee Award Based On The Trial Court’s In Camera Review Of Class Counsel’s Billing Records Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
30
2014
Supreme Court Relaxes Standard for Shifting Fees in “Exceptional Cases” and Increases Deference to District Court Decisions Awarding or Denying Fees Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
19
2014
DRS Technical Services, Inc. To Pay a Settlement of $13.7 Million to U.S. Government for Overbilling Tycko & Zavareei LLP
Aug
19
2015
Volkswagen Group of America v. Velocity Patent: Denying Institution for Lack of Evidentiary Support for Grounds of Unpatentability IPR2015-00276 Faegre Drinker
Mar
1
2018
Tenth Circuit Takes Expansive View of the Definition of the Term “Mining,” Holding Wind Farm Project Needs Permit Prior to Commencement of Excavation in Tribal Mineral Estate Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
6
2020
High Court Articulates Test for Applicability of California Wage Statement Requirements to Interstate Workers Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
15
2021
CAFC Tightens Enablement Standard for Functional Claiming of Antibodies Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
29
2021
1933 Act Cases: An Excerpt from Securities Class Action Filings—2021 Midyear Assessment Cornerstone Research
Aug
20
2022
Serving Taiwanese Defendants by Mail under the Federal Rules Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Feb
28
2023
ADVANCED!: Advanced Marketing Compels Trial on Arbitration in a TCPA Case And It was Well Done Troutman Amin, LLP
Jun
4
2011
Federal Circuit Attempts to Eradicate the Plague of Inequitable Conduct, Sets New Standards Vedder Price
Nov
25
2013
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Appellate Court Decision Sets Stage for Next Skirmish in the Smart Phone Wars McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
15
2014
IBM Corp. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion to file Supplemental Information IPR2014-00180 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins