Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
1
2011
Developments in California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Nov
18
2013
Reference to Employee’s “Shelf Life” Not Enough to Prove Age Discrimination Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
27
2015
The Disaster Control Act Does Not Grant A Municipality With The Power To Acquire Perpetual Interests In Property Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.
Aug
17
2015
NESTLÉ USA v. STEUBEN FOODS: Differing Claim Construction For The Same Patent Claims In Two Separate IPRs IPR2015-00023 Faegre Drinker
Dec
21
2016
Delaware Chancery Court Lacks Personal Jurisdiction Under LLC Act's Implied Consent Provision Unless Defendant Has "Control" or "Decision-Making" Capability K&L Gates
Mar
2
2018
Pennsylvania Supreme Court: If You Want to Search a Cell Phone, Get a Warrant! Ballard Spahr LLP
May
30
2018
Supreme Court Update: Collins v. Virginia & Lagos v. United States Wiggin and Dana LLP
Dec
2
2018
Reminder: Confusing Background Check Disclosures Can Get an Employer in FCRA Hot Water! Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
16
2020
Privacy Shield Invalidated by Top EU Court; Standard Contractual Clauses Upheld (But There Are Still Major Challenges Ahead) Mintz
Nov
19
2020
When Jurors Want to Quarantine Mid-Trial… McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
24
2021
In United States v. Arthrex, Supreme Court Holds Administrative Patent Judges’ Decisions Must Be Reviewed by the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
17
2022
Privacy and Suspect Rights - UK Supreme Court Confirms an Individual’s Right to Privacy When Under Criminal Investigation Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Nov
30
2023
Taxpayer Loses Claim for Research Credit McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
11
2014
DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com: Federal Circuit Affirms Patent Eligibility for Some Types of Internet-based Claims Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
23
2016
First Data Corp v. Coqui Tech: Decision Denying Institution Where Petitioner Does Not Provide Adequate Structure Corresponding To Alleged Means-Plus-Function Limitations IPR2015-01667 Faegre Drinker
Sep
30
2016
Incomplete Preemption Does Not Result in Patent-Eligible Subject Matter McDermott Will & Emery
May
27
2020
USPTO Introduces Prioritized Examination Pilot Program for Patent Applications Related to COVID-19
Mar
3
2023
New Jersey Court Says Employee Discharged for Discipline Not Entitled to Payment for Accrued PTO Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Aug
14
2023
HEAP OF TROUBLE: Calendly Sued in CIPA Class Action For Using Heap Tech and the Czar is Cool With It Troutman Amin, LLP
May
15
2024
California District Court Dismisses Conclusory ERISA “Fee” Complaint Unsupported by Facts Jackson Lewis P.C.
May
9
2013
California Businesses Beware: California Supreme Court Expands the Fraud Exception of the Parol Evidence Rule Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
27
2014
Harming a Company in the Forum State Does Not Constitute ‘Minimum Contacts’ for Personal Jurisdiction Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
9
2015
Reconsidering Consideration: Lesson from Pennsylvania Supreme Court Polsinelli PC
Jul
26
2016
Sleeping on the Job Disqualifies Residential Counselor from Unemployment Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
May
4
2017
Does ATE insurance Trump Security for Costs in UK? After the Event Insurance Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
6
2020
Morrisons Data Breach – Revisiting the “Rogue Employee” Question Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
8
2022
No Mulligans Here: PTO Rewinds Reexamination Based on Estoppel McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
28
2024
When the ET Won’t Bite Back – Limits on Strike Out-Powers (UK) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins