Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Apr
20
2017
Seventh Circuit Finds Sexual Orientation Protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act K&L Gates
Oct
26
2018
Copyright Board’s Royalty Rates for Streaming Services Can Play On McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
27
2019
No Brainer: Summary Judgment Based On Non-asserted Grounds Procedurally Improper McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
5
2020
Illinois Supreme Court Affirms School District Must Pay for Emergency Construction Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
19
2020
A Social Contract – Terms to Consider for Influencer Advertising Agreements Faegre Drinker
Jan
4
2021
New House Whistleblower Rule Sends A Strong Message Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto
Dec
12
2022
“Cold-Pressed Juice” Lawsuit Permanently Dismissed Keller and Heckman LLP
Apr
12
2011
Federal Judge Orders Employer to Reinstate Three Memphis Warehouse Workers and Stop Threatening Union supporters While Case Proceeds at NLRB National Labor Relations Board
Sep
2
2012
Michigan’s Panhandling Statute Held Unconstitutional Varnum LLP
Jul
26
2013
In Koontz, the Supreme Court Creates Uncertainty for Permitting Agencies and Opportunities for Developers Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
20
2014
Through the Rabbit-Hole: Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International: Supreme Court Holds “Merely Requiring Generic Computer Implementation” Cannot Transform an “Abstract Idea into a Patent-Eligible Invention” Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
11
2016
Life Settlement Disclosure Legislation Faegre Drinker
Jul
1
2016
Demmler v. ACH Food Companies, Inc.: Mooting Consumer Class Actions in Response to Pre-Suit Demand Letters Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Dec
8
2016
Supreme Court Resolves Insider Trading Circuit Split Bracewell LLP
May
11
2018
The Supreme Court Discusses When A Statute May Be Unconstitutionally Vague – Will It Be Extended to False Claims Act Cases? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
20
2018
Duck Boat Sinks in Missouri Lake Killing 17 People Clifford Law Offices
Nov
13
2020
Class Action Litigation Related to COVID-19: Filed and Anticipated Cases (Updated November 9) Pierce Atwood LLP
Jul
30
2020
Trends in Merger Investigations and Enforcement at the European Commission 2019 Cornerstone Research
Jan
13
2022
U.S. Supreme Court Rules on Vaccine Mandates from OSHA and CMS Polsinelli PC
Aug
31
2022
Massachusetts Contractor Retaliated Against Injured Immigrant Worker; Jury Awards $650K in Damages Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Aug
21
2023
OCR Official Speaks About Compliance Concerns for HIPAA Covered Entities and Business Associates Jackson Lewis P.C.
Apr
21
2013
Petitioner Allowed to Submit Supplemental Information After Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Trial and Appeal Board Trial Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
7
2014
Employer E-Discovery Duties Expand in a "BYOD" Environment Re: Employee Devices von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Apr
18
2014
Fiduciary Breach Claims Barred by Employee Retirement Income Security Act's (ERISA) Six-Year Statute of Limitations Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
9
2014
Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc.: Granting and Denying in Part Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2013-00453 Faegre Drinker
Feb
20
2015
The Ninth Circuit’s Request That The California Supreme Court Clarify Ambiguous Language In California’s Day-of-Rest Requirements Could Have A Tremendous Impact Upon Employers Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jun
22
2015
Board Limits Multiple IPR Challenges in Samsung Electronics v. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
1
2015
Settlement Agreement Precludes Consideration of Order Criticizing Attorney Conduct McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins