Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
20
2013
Counterfeits, Trademark Infringement, and Contributory Liability: Your Vendors are Your Problem Mintz
Jan
2
2014
The Dangers of Employees Taking A “Working Lunch” Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
20
2015
New Jersey High Court Rules “Watchdog” Employees Protected Under State Whistleblower Law Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
11
2016
Unified Patents v. Olivistar: Decision Denying Institution Where Every Element Of Challenged Claims Not Identified In Prior Art IPR2015-01217 Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2016
Eighth Circuit Reverses Class Certification with Defendants' Post-Halliburton II Rebuttal of Fraud-on-the-Market Presumption Vedder Price
Nov
1
2016
Job Applicants Cannot Bring Disparate Impact Claims Under Age Discrimination In Employment Act Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
19
2018
In SEC v. Cohen, Court Continues Trend of Limiting SEC Enforcement Powers Covington & Burling LLP
Nov
21
2019
Former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb Calls for a Ban on Vaping Products Most Widely Used by Youth Keller and Heckman LLP
Jun
5
2020
The Odyssey Must Be Timed Just Right McDermott Will & Emery
May
15
2022
Texas Supreme Court Dismisses Claims By Co-Trustee And Beneficiary Due To Statute Of Limitations And Clarifies That An Unnamed Contingent Beneficiary Can Have Standing To Sue Winstead
Oct
26
2023
Protecting the Quarterback (and Everyone Else, Too) Nelson Mullins
Aug
8
2010
California Court of Appeal Extends Wrongful Termination Cause of Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
20
2012
Supreme Court Issues Long-Awaited Decision in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
7
2013
Supreme Court Holds That Proof Of Materiality Is Not A Prerequisite To Certification Of Fraud-On-The-Market Securities Class Actions Bracewell LLP
Sep
12
2013
Federal Courts Once Again Find Act 10 Union Rights Enforceable von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
May
26
2015
Partition Me? Unmarried Joint Tenants with Full Rights of Survivorship Fail to State a Claim in Michigan Varnum LLP
Nov
6
2015
Florida Appellate Court Rules Former Customers Are Not a Legitimate Business Interests Jackson Lewis P.C.
May
25
2016
Maryland Court of Appeals OKs Circumstantial Causation Evidence in Lead Paint Cases Beveridge & Diamond PC
Apr
17
2019
Plaintiff With PTSD Not Disabled Under The ADA, Sixth Circuit Rules Jackson Lewis P.C.
Apr
14
2020
Second Circuit Goes Against the Tide: Adopts Broad Definition of Autodialer K&L Gates
Dec
10
2021
New York Becomes the Third State to Adopt a Constitutional Green Amendment Beveridge & Diamond PC
Feb
22
2022
Federal Court Gives Rare Refusal for Final Sign Off on Data Privacy Class Action Settlement, Faulting Low Take Rate and Excessive Fees Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
1
2024
The Impact of the FTC’s Noncompete Rule on Current and Future Noncompete Litigation ArentFox Schiff LLP
May
28
2014
Michigan Appeals Court Reaffirms True Object Test for Remote Access Software McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
8
2015
SEC Rejects Constitutional Challenge to Administrative Proceeding Proskauer Rose LLP
May
31
2017
U.S. Supreme Court Limits a Patentee’s Ability to Enforce Downstream Patent Rights Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
28
2017
Florida Now Follows New York to Find No Common Law Public Performance Right For Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2019
Illinois Supreme Court Rules Actual Injury Not Needed to Be an “Aggrieved” Party under Biometric Privacy Law Proskauer Rose LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins