Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jan
27
2022
Appeal Shuttered for Lack of Finality McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2023
Time to Reboot the Internet? The Supreme Court Hears Challenges to Big Tech Platforms Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Sep
14
2014
ARM Inc. v. Vantage Point Technology, Inc., Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00467 Faegre Drinker
Sep
9
2015
Qui Tam Lawsuits and the Statute of Limitations Dickinson Wright PLLC
Aug
25
2016
Mobile App Operator Not Liable Under TCPA Faegre Drinker
Oct
12
2017
Potential Game Changing Decision: Extended Leave Not A Reasonable Accommodation Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.
May
10
2024
EPA Accepting Comment on Proposed Consent Decrees to Settle Lawsuits Challenging Time to Complete TSCA Risk Evaluations Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
Dec
14
2018
2nd Circuit Applied Taxi Cab Overtime Exemption to a Chauffeur Operator Keller and Heckman LLP
Aug
16
2019
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Key Kickback Statute, Stark Law, and False Claims Act Principles in Dismissing Allegations Against HCA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
12
2020
Preparing For Litigation As A Small Business Raymond Law Group LLC
Nov
8
2021
Circuit Court Blocks OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard, at Least for Now – Stay Tuned Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jun
28
2022
TCPAWORLD AFTER DARK: Republican Congressional Candidate Sues Rival For “Defamatory” Robotexts Troutman Amin, LLP
Jan
1
2014
City Employee Properly Alleged Fourth Amendment Violation for Unreasonable Search and Seizure by Ordering Drug Test Based on Personal Animosity Jackson Lewis P.C.
May
30
2014
Mentor Graphics Corporation v. Synopsys, Inc. Denying Request for Authorization to File Motion to Supplement IPR2014-00287 Faegre Drinker
Mar
24
2016
Federal Circuit Finds Personal Jurisdiction over Mylan in Two Hatch-Waxman Appeals Mintz
May
29
2016
Expensive Discovery an Unfortunate Consequence of a Provision Intended to Prevent Costly Litigation ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jan
26
2017
Obviousness Rejection Over Combination of Prior Art References May be Proper Even Where There Was No Explicit Teaching, Suggestion, or Motivation to Combine Hunton Andrews Kurth
May
22
2017
Class Action Reform and “Fairness in Class Action Act”
Jul
21
2017
Summary of NLRB Decisions for Week of July 10 – 14 Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
23
2024
NLRB Rules Employee's Display of 'BLM' Insignia Protected by National Labor Relations Act Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
28
2019
Stranded in State Court: Supreme Court Holds that Third-Party Counterclaim Defendants Cannot Remove Class-Action Counterclaims to Federal Court Faegre Drinker
Nov
3
2020
Here’s Your TCPA Distraction for a Normal Tuesday With Nothing Else Going On: Mind-Melting Decision Proves a Dialer Can Never Be Too Old to be An ATDS Troutman Amin, LLP
Apr
2
2021
Does A Plaintiff Have Standing To Sue Based On A Purely Technical Violation Of The FCRA’s “Employment Purposes” Protections? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
4
2022
Wisconsin Supreme Court Strengthens Employers Defenses in Some Arrest and Conviction Record Discrimination Cases
Jan
4
2023
Ninth Circuit Confirms FMCSA Preemption of California’s Meal and Rest Break Laws Applies Retroactively Hunton Andrews Kurth
Sep
11
2013
Rule 144 Opinion Letters – Do They Protect Anyone? Re: Securities Law Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Mar
20
2014
Join the Party. Another California-Based Former Employee Challenges Out-of-State Company’s Non-Compete Provisions as Unfair Business Practice Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
21
2015
Square v. REM Holdings 3: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable as Obvious Over Evidence of Copying Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins