Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jul
23
2014
ScentAir Technologies, Inc. v. Prolitec, Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00180 Faegre Drinker
Jul
23
2014
Citigroup Settles with DOJ for $7 Billion Bilzin Sumberg
Jul
23
2014
Dueling Decisions in the 4th and D.C. Circuit Courts of Appeals Spell More ACA Uncertainty for Employers Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
23
2014
Sequenom, Inc. v. The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00337 Faegre Drinker
Jul
23
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 23, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
23
2014
Virginia Federal Judge Rejects Highly Compensated IT Professional’s Misclassification Claim Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
22
2014
A Complex Question Facing Employers under the ADAAA - To Accommodate or Not Accommodate? - Americans with Disabilities Act Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
22
2014
SawStop Dismissal Explained: Opinion Crosscutting SawStop’s Antitrust Lawsuit Released Mintz
Jul
22
2014
Delaware Court of Chancery Rejects Indemnification Slight of Hand Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
22
2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00252 Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2014
Cal-OSHA Turns Down the Heat - Occupational Safety and Health Administration Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
22
2014
Symantec Corporation v. RPost Communications Limited, Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00353 Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2014
What Trademark Filing Trends Reveal About Expected Brand Growth – and What it Means for Your Global Brand Protection Strategy Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
22
2014
A Primer: Economic Loss Doctrine Not Necessarily Bar to Tort Recovery Sherin and Lodgen LLP
Jul
22
2014
Google Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. v. CreateAds LLC, Decision Regarding Standard for Claim Construction IPR2014-00200 Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 22, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
22
2014
Child Custody Transfers-When Does the Statutory Parental Presumption Apply? Gilbert LLP
Jul
22
2014
What Are Your Company’s Wage & Hour Risks? [VIDEO] Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2014
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Decides Not to Risk Its D.R. Horton Decision Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
22
2014
California Dividend Statutes Found To Preempt Common Law Claims Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jul
22
2014
International Securities Exchange, LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated, Decision Granting Additional Discovery IPR2014-00097, 98 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2014
Toshiba Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Not To Institute IPR2014-00317 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2014
Iron Dome LLC v. E-Watch, Inc., Expunging Unauthorized Motion to Exclude and Reply to Preliminary Response IPR2014-00439 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2014
Supreme Court Caps the EPA’s Authority to Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stationary Sources: Only When a Permit is Required Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
21
2014
Texas Federal Court Dismisses FCA (False Claims Act) Claims As Insufficiently Pled Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
21
2014
Fifth Circuit Confirms Employer’s Right To Set Workweek For Payroll Purposes Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
21
2014
Advantages of Filing More Than One IPR (Inter Partes Review) Against A Single Patent Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
21
2014
Insurer’s Poorly Drafted Language Applied As Written; Insured Can’t Complain When New York Law is Applied After It Chose to Reject Missouri Tax Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins