Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Aug
20
2021
Fifth Circuit Drops THE HAMMER, Reinstates Law Firm’s Keyword Trademark Infringement Suit Alleging Initial Interest Confusion Finnegan
Jan
4
2023
Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court Affirms 3-Year Prison Sentence for Counterfeiting “Bordeaux” Collective Trademark Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
3
2012
What Doesn’t Kill Me, Makes Me Stronger—Surviving Allegations of Copyright Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
22
2023
Lizama et al. v. H&M: A Lesson in Artful Crafting of Green Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
20
2024
AI Got It Wrong, Doesn’t Mean We Are Right: Practical Considerations for the Use of Generative AI for Commercial Litigators Proskauer Rose LLP
May
6
2014
Ninth Circuit Confirms that Trademark Cancellation Is a Remedy and Not a Cause of Action: Airs Aromatics v. Victoria’s Secret McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
26
2014
Texas Court of Appeals Holds There is No Right Under The Administrative Procedure Act to Seek Judicial Review of a State Agency's Denial of a Petition for Rulemaking Bracewell LLP
Feb
29
2016
Cami Li Cannot Compete: BPI Sports v. Camila Figueras Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
2
2016
Seventh Circuit Issues Reverse Discrimination Employment Decision Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C.
Oct
10
2016
Retail Employment: You Snooze, You Don’t Necessarily Lose Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Dec
21
2017
Recent Kentucky Cases Hold That Exempt Owner Does Not Mean Property Taxes Precluded, and Leased Real Property Value May Include “Intangible Values” Dickinson Wright PLLC
Aug
4
2018
You’ve Got Mail: NLRB Requests Briefing on Standard for Employee Use of Employer Owned Electronic Communication Systems Proskauer Rose LLP
May
27
2020
Sixth Circuit stays injunction in Ohio pandemic voting rights case Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
11
2021
$102 Million Pay Stub, Meal Break Judgment Against Walmart Reversed Jackson Lewis P.C.
Sep
16
2022
FASHIONABLE LAWSUIT: Edgy Dispenser of Faux Fashion Urban Outfitters Faces FTSA Class Action for Blast Text Messages Troutman Amin, LLP
Mar
28
2023
Examining the Mexican Supreme Court’s Application of Punitive and Moral Damages. OLIVARES
Jan
3
2024
Federal Circuit Clarifies Reach of “Artificial” Act of Patent Infringement Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
19
2015
Hopkins Manufacturing v. Cequent Performance Products: Petition for Inter Partes Review Denied IPR2015-00616 Faegre Drinker
Dec
16
2015
Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Not Unpatentable IPR2014-01146 Faegre Drinker
May
3
2016
Glyphosate Litigation Primer Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Oct
3
2017
SEC ALJ Decision Shows Agency’s “Home Field Advantage” Has Its Limits Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
4
2020
Platform Provider Paradox: Text Platform Provider Twilio May Be Directly Liable for TCPA Violations by Its Clients Troutman Amin, LLP
Feb
15
2019
First Cir. Sets Pleading Standard For FCA Whistleblower Retaliation Claims Proskauer Rose LLP
Apr
4
2020
Second Circuit Holds that Registering to do Business in New York Under Section 1301 of the Business Corporation Law Does Not Constitute Consent to General Personal Jurisdiction in New York Courts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
5
2021
Cementing Victory by Accepting Defeat: When Can a Patentee’s Infringement Disclaimer Moot an Appeal of an IPR Decision? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2022
Responding to a Complaint to the Medical Board Ward and Smith, P.A.
Jun
26
2011
Ninth Circuit Rejects Consumer Antitrust Challenge To Cable Television Bundling Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
11
2023
Court Holds That an Order Was Not Final for Appeal Where There Was Still an Issue of Intestancy Remaining to Be Determined Winstead
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins