HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
Tenth Circuit Finds Plan Administrator Has No Duty to Inquire into Authenticity of Participant’s Beneficiary Designation
Monday, December 1, 2014

Plaintiff Kristopher Towles, the son of a deceased participant of a life insurance plan, challenged the plan’s decision to pay the life insurance proceeds to the deceased’s husband, contending that the beneficiary form replacing him with the deceased husband had been forged.  After five attempts to state a claim, the district court dismissed the complaint for failure to plead a viable claim.  The Tenth Circuit affirmed and further noted that Kristopher’s allegations that the forms were forged failed to state a claim under ERISA because a plan administrator has no duty to inquire into the authenticity of the forms if it had “no reason to suspect that anything was amiss.”  The case is Yarbary v. Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP, No. 14-3101, 2014 WL 6679881 (10th Cir. Nov. 24, 2014).

HTML Embed Code
HB Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins