HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot Geoffrey A. Friedman Email617.348.3096Bio and Articles Matthew C. HurleyEmail617-348-4939Bio and Articles HB Ad Slot Fashion Nova’s Arbitration Clause Fades Away by: Geoffrey A. Friedman , Matthew C. Hurley of Mintz - Friday, March 1, 2024 Related Practices & Jurisdictions Litigation Trial PracticeADR Arbitration MediationCommunications Media Internet 9th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy) Print Mail Download />i Facebook Twitter Linkedin Pinterest Reddit Facebook Messenger Email Digg Print X Buffer Flipboard Online retailers routinely include arbitration clauses in the terms of service for their website, seeking to send any consumer claims to arbitration and to eliminate a consumer’s right to file a class action lawsuit. Companies adopting this approach—and indeed, the drafters of any arbitration clause—should pay careful attention to the questions of (1) who will decide whether particular claims are subject to arbitration; and (2) the scope of any carve-outs from the arbitration provision, as the recent decision in Dembiczak v. Fashion Nova, LLC demonstrates.[1] The Dembiczak case is a putative class action alleging that Fashion Nova falsely advertised discounts on its products. After the plaintiff filed suit in federal district court, Fashion Nova sought to compel the plaintiff to arbitrate her claims based on the Terms of Service on the company’s website, which require arbitration in certain instances. Initially, the court confronted the question of which decisionmaker decides the scope of the arbitration provision, or the “arbitrability” of the dispute at hand. The court applied the long-standing rule that a court should decide this threshold question unless “there is clear and unmistakable evidence” that the parties delegated the question of arbitrability to the arbitrator. Parties often seek to delegate this question to the arbitrator by incorporating in their agreements the rules of an arbitral forum that does so, like the rules of the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”). Although Fashion Nova attempted to incorporate the AAA rules for consumers in its terms of service, the court found that the version of the AAA “rules” cited by Fashion Nova did not in fact exist. Finding Fashion Nova’s incorporation of AAA rules anything but “clear and unmistakable,” the court determined that it, and not an arbitrator, had the authority to decide whether plaintiff’s claims were subject to arbitration. The court then concluded that the plain language of Fashion Nova’s Terms of Service had a carveout for injunctive relief that removed plaintiff’s entire putative class action from the scope of the arbitration provision. The court’s decision turned primarily on language in the Terms of Service providing that “an action by a party for temporary, preliminary, or permanent injunctive relief” is one category of disputes that “shall not be subject to arbitration.” This language, the court reasoned, was more expansive than if Fashion Nova had carved out only “a claim” seeking injunctive relief. Because the plaintiff sought injunctive relief on behalf of the putative class, the court concluded that this was “an action by a party” seeking injunctive relief and denied the motion to compel arbitration. Whether or not one agrees with the court’s interpretation of the Fashion Nova arbitration provision, the decision underscores the need for precision in the drafting of any arbitration provision. With respect to providing “clear and unmistakable evidence” of intent to delegate questions of arbitrability, drafters of an arbitration provision must either (a) explicitly delegate this gateway question to the arbitrators, in the text of the arbitration provision itself; or (b) explicitly and clearly incorporate the rules of an arbitral forum that supports delegation and ensure that the cited rules continue to exist and are readily identifiable. The court’s decision also strongly suggests that, had Fashion Nova carved out “claims” or the “remedy” of injunctive relief instead of “actions” seeking injunctive relief, the outcome of the arbitration question would have been different. Expect further developments on both of these key issues as courts across the country continue to grapple with the meaning of delegation and carveout clauses of arbitration provisions. [1] 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25115 (W.D. Wa. Feb. 13, 2024). ©1994-2024 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Pinterest Reddit Facebook Messenger Email Digg Print Mastodon X Buffer Flipboard Current Public Notices Post Your Public Notice Today! PUBLIC NOTICE OF ASSIGNEE’S SALE: AUCTION OF ASSETS OF CHICAGO WICKER & TRADING CO. PUBLIC NOTICE OF CHAPTER 11 SALE: Solar Biotech, Inc. PUBLIC NOTICE OF UCC SALE: Secured Party Sale NOTIFICATION OF CONTINUED ARTICLE 9 DISPOSITION OF NEWPORT EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC. PUBLIC NOTICE OF UCC SALE: Wildcat LLC PUBLIC NOTICE OF UCC SALE: Pelrous Fund REIT, LLC Discover more public notices HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot Current Legal Analysis Supreme Court Vacates and Remands IRS Tax Whistleblower Case Following Reversal of Chevron by: Whistleblower Law at Kohn Kohn Colapinto The Never-Ending Fiduciary Rule Story Continues: Effective Date of DOL’s Newest Fiduciary Investment Advice Rule Delayed by Federal Court in Texas by: Adam W Scoll Bipartisan House Working Group Releases Report Calling for Increased Oversight of AI in the Financial Services and Housing Markets – AI: The Washington Report by: Bruce D. Sokler , Alexander Hecht Beltway Buzz, July 26, 2024 by: James J. Plunkett Weekly IRS Roundup July 15 – July 19, 2024 by: Evan Walters , Kevin Spencer OFCCP Releases Expedited Conciliation Procedures Directive by: Laura A. Mitchell HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot More from Mintz Bipartisan House Working Group Releases Report Calling for Increased Oversight of AI in the Financial Services and Housing Markets – AI: The Washington Report by: Bruce D. Sokler , Alexander Hecht Governor Newsom Proposes 2-Year Delay to California Climate Disclosure Law by: Jacob H. Hupart EPA’s Exclamation that PFAS Are Unsafe in Minute Concentrations Is Turning Out To Have Serious Ramifications for Many, Including EPA. by: Jeffrey R. Porter Washington Shake-Up: Vice President Harris to Lead Democratic Nomination for 2024 Presidency by: Pamela Mejia , R. Neal Martin Webinar Recording: The Telecom Industry Post Chevron- What It Means for your Business [Video] by: Angela Y. Kung , Daniel P. Reing Understanding the 2024 USPTO Guidance Update on AI Patent Eligibility by: Frank L. Gerratana , Terri Shieh-Newton, PhD FTC Watchdog Monitors Competitive Implications of Surveillance Pricing by: Bruce D. Sokler , Payton T. Thornton SEC Commissioner Peirce Critiques ESG Reporting Frameworks by: Jacob H. Hupart Puerto Rico Launches Climate Tort Lawsuit Against Fossil Fuel Companies by: Jacob H. Hupart The Demise of the Chevron Doctrine Begins to Impact ESG Jurisprudence by: Jacob H. Hupart Upcoming Legal Education Events Oct 23 2024 33rd Annual Law of Product Distribution and Franchise Seminar Oct 9 2024 Government Contracts Annual Update 2024 Sep 6 2024 Public Company Shareholder Engagement Summit Sep 6 2024 2024 Employment Law Symposium HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot Print