HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot Geoffrey A. Friedman Email617.348.3096Bio and Articles Matthew C. HurleyEmail617-348-4939Bio and Articles Find Your Next Job ! Paralegal - Illinois Social Services Attorney Associate Litigation Attorney Explore More Job Openings HB Ad Slot Fashion Nova’s Arbitration Clause Fades Away by: Geoffrey A. Friedman , Matthew C. Hurley of Mintz Friday, March 1, 2024 Related Practices & Jurisdictions Litigation Trial PracticeADR Arbitration MediationCommunications Media Internet 9th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy) Print Mail Download />i Facebook Twitter Linkedin Pinterest Reddit Facebook Messenger Email Digg Print X Buffer Flipboard Online retailers routinely include arbitration clauses in the terms of service for their website, seeking to send any consumer claims to arbitration and to eliminate a consumer’s right to file a class action lawsuit. Companies adopting this approach—and indeed, the drafters of any arbitration clause—should pay careful attention to the questions of (1) who will decide whether particular claims are subject to arbitration; and (2) the scope of any carve-outs from the arbitration provision, as the recent decision in Dembiczak v. Fashion Nova, LLC demonstrates.[1] The Dembiczak case is a putative class action alleging that Fashion Nova falsely advertised discounts on its products. After the plaintiff filed suit in federal district court, Fashion Nova sought to compel the plaintiff to arbitrate her claims based on the Terms of Service on the company’s website, which require arbitration in certain instances. Initially, the court confronted the question of which decisionmaker decides the scope of the arbitration provision, or the “arbitrability” of the dispute at hand. The court applied the long-standing rule that a court should decide this threshold question unless “there is clear and unmistakable evidence” that the parties delegated the question of arbitrability to the arbitrator. Parties often seek to delegate this question to the arbitrator by incorporating in their agreements the rules of an arbitral forum that does so, like the rules of the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”). Although Fashion Nova attempted to incorporate the AAA rules for consumers in its terms of service, the court found that the version of the AAA “rules” cited by Fashion Nova did not in fact exist. Finding Fashion Nova’s incorporation of AAA rules anything but “clear and unmistakable,” the court determined that it, and not an arbitrator, had the authority to decide whether plaintiff’s claims were subject to arbitration. The court then concluded that the plain language of Fashion Nova’s Terms of Service had a carveout for injunctive relief that removed plaintiff’s entire putative class action from the scope of the arbitration provision. The court’s decision turned primarily on language in the Terms of Service providing that “an action by a party for temporary, preliminary, or permanent injunctive relief” is one category of disputes that “shall not be subject to arbitration.” This language, the court reasoned, was more expansive than if Fashion Nova had carved out only “a claim” seeking injunctive relief. Because the plaintiff sought injunctive relief on behalf of the putative class, the court concluded that this was “an action by a party” seeking injunctive relief and denied the motion to compel arbitration. Whether or not one agrees with the court’s interpretation of the Fashion Nova arbitration provision, the decision underscores the need for precision in the drafting of any arbitration provision. With respect to providing “clear and unmistakable evidence” of intent to delegate questions of arbitrability, drafters of an arbitration provision must either (a) explicitly delegate this gateway question to the arbitrators, in the text of the arbitration provision itself; or (b) explicitly and clearly incorporate the rules of an arbitral forum that supports delegation and ensure that the cited rules continue to exist and are readily identifiable. The court’s decision also strongly suggests that, had Fashion Nova carved out “claims” or the “remedy” of injunctive relief instead of “actions” seeking injunctive relief, the outcome of the arbitration question would have been different. Expect further developments on both of these key issues as courts across the country continue to grapple with the meaning of delegation and carveout clauses of arbitration provisions. [1] 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25115 (W.D. Wa. Feb. 13, 2024). ©1994-2025 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Pinterest Reddit Facebook Messenger Email Digg Print Mastodon X Buffer Flipboard HTML Embed Code Current Public Notices Post Your Public Notice Today! PUBLIC NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: Common Cents Distributors, LLCPublished: 26 June, 2025 PUBLIC NOTICE OF UCC SALE: Hudson 1702, LLCPublished: 24 June, 2025 PUBLIC NOTICE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SALE: American Energy Storage Innovations Inc.Published: 24 June, 2025 PUBLIC NOTICE OF UCC ARTICLE 9 SALE: Chesterfield Faring, LTDPublished: 24 June, 2025 PUBLIC NOTICE OF ASSIGNEE SALE: Quadrata, Inc.Published: 23 June, 2025 PUBLIC NOTICE OF UCC ARTICLE 9 SALE: Villa Graves ProperitesPublished: 23 June, 2025 PUBLIC NOTICE OF AUCTION OF ASSETS: Avenu TechnologiesPublished: 23 June, 2025 PUBLIC NOTICE OF UCC SALE: Equity interests in Life Spine, Inc.Published: 17 June, 2025 PUBLIC NOTICE OF UCC ARTICLE 9 SALE: HM LAND ACQUISITION, LLC AND M&H INVESTMENT GROUP, LLCPublished: 16 June, 2025 PUBLIC NOTICE OF UCC ARTICLE 9 SALE: Meyer Burger (Americas) LTDPublished: 16 June, 2025 PUBLIC NOTICE OF UCC ARTICLE 9 SALE: CCP Mezzanine Nashville I, LLCPublished: 28 May, 2025 Discover more public notices HB Ad Slot Current Legal Analysis EPA to Reconsider Asbestos Part 1 Risk Management Rule Following Legal Challenge by: Kathryn A. Bursick , L. Claire Hansen SCOTUS’s CASA Decision Ends Nationwide Injunctions, Creating Uncertainty Around Enforcement of Executive and Agency Actions by: Stephanie L. Adler-Paindiris , Eric R. Magnus Beltway Buzz, June 27, 2025 by: James J. Plunkett Cal/OSHA’s Significant Revisions to Proposed Workplace Violence Regulation Would Create More Obligations for More Employers by: Michael R. Watts , Sierra Vierra OFCCP Solicits Voluntary Updates on Contractors’ Wind-Down of EO 11246 Obligations by: Lauren B. Hicks , Christopher J. Near HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot More from Mintz SEC Withdraws Guidance That Companies Must Disclose Foreign Climate Litigation by: Jacob H. Hupart Trump Administration SEC Withdraws Proposed Anti-Greenwashing Rule by: Jacob H. Hupart Client Alert: Delaware Franchise Taxes by: Samuel Asher Effron Oregon Law Restricts Common Management Service Organization – Professional Entity Structure by: Cody Keetch , Kate F. Stewart DOJ Civil Division Publishes Memo Outlining Trump Administration Civil Enforcement Priority Related to Health Care by: Joanne S. Hawana , Samantha P. Kingsbury OIG Favorable Advisory Opinion on Physician Practice’s Arrangement with Telehealth Platform and Recent Corporate Practice of Medicine Developments by: Daniel A. Cody , Cassandra L. Paolillo Canada Refines Focus on Greenwashing Prosecutions by: Jacob H. Hupart Energy & Sustainability Washington Update — June 2025 by: John Lushetsky , R. Neal Martin Energy & Sustainability Washington Update — May 2025 by: R. Neal Martin , John Lushetsky Ratings Agency Announces That It Will Analyze Physical Climate Risk When Evaluating Certain Assets by: Jacob H. Hupart PBMs Sue Arkansas Over Restrictive PBM Ownership Law by: Theresa C. Carnegie , Hassan Shaikh Federal Court Upholds SEC Regulations From First Trump Administration That Discourage Activist (ESG) Investors by: Jacob H. Hupart CMS Sheds Light on its Timeline for Expedited RADV Audits by: Tara E. Dwyer , Bridgette A. Keller Climate Lawsuit Against German Energy Company Dismissed by Court by: Jacob H. Hupart Canada Pauses Mandatory Climate Disclosure Rules by: Jacob H. Hupart HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot Upcoming Events Jul 2 2025 Top Tips for Employers – Drug Testing Policies, Administration, & Litigation Jul 8 2025 Environmental Essentials Webinar - EPA’s Proposed Repeal of the Carbon Pollution Standards for Power Plants: Implications for the Rest of Industry Jul 9 2025 Employment Law in the US Jul 10 2025 Checkmate: Making the Right Moves in Complex Workplace Investigations Print