Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Sep
15
2021
Ninth Circuit Denies Sherman Act Challenge To No-Poach Provision Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2021
China’s Hainan Province Proposes 1 Million RMB Rewards for Reporting Intellectual Property Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
15
2021
Prosecution Pointers 286-294 Finnegan
Sep
14
2021
Update: Federal Judge Rules That Only Natural Persons Can Be Inventors Winstead
Sep
14
2021
Bad Faith Prosecution Of Trade Secrets Theft May Lead To Attorney's Fee Award (Or Not) Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Sep
10
2021
Augmented Reality/Virtual Reality Patent Prosecution Update: 2021 Q1 Prosecution Statistics Finnegan
Sep
9
2021
Federal Circuit Reiterates Requirement under § 287 that Alleged Infringers have Notice of Specific Alleged Infringement Mintz
Sep
9
2021
Federal Circuit Vaporizes Pre-Suit Damages Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Sep
9
2021
The Delhi High Court Rules on The Scope of The Bolar Exception Nishith Desai Associates
Sep
9
2021
Bascom Cannot Save Your Claims if Your Own Patent Says You Used Known Technology McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
9
2021
Damage Expert Testimony Excluded for Failure to Disclose Evidence and to Apportion McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
9
2021
Another Genus Claim Bites the Dust for Lack of Written Description McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
9
2021
Update on Artificial Intelligence: Court Rules that AI Cannot Qualify As “Inventor” Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
9
2021
Ownership of Inventions By Former Employers: Lessons after Bio-Rad v. ITC Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
9
2021
3D Chess at the Federal Circuit: Can’t Walk Back Arguments in Prior Appeal or Prosecution History McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
9
2021
Foreign Company’s Purposeful US Activities Blemishes Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Defense McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
8
2021
Part II: The Current State of Precedential Opinions and Denials of Institution at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board – Advanced Bionics and Section 325(d) Discretionary Denials Finnegan
Sep
7
2021
Xiaoi Robot Seeks Preliminary Injunction Against Apple in Shanghai Patent Infringement Suit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
7
2021
File It or Lose It Finnegan
Sep
7
2021
Sharing Motion Picture Materials: Practical Considerations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
7
2021
Plaintiffs Beware – Disclose all Evidence of Lost Profits Damages During Discovery Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
7
2021
PTAB Challenges to Orange Book-Listed and Biologic Patents Finnegan
Sep
7
2021
Prosecution History Estoppel: Still Lurking for The Unwary Summa PLLC
Sep
7
2021
New York and Chicago-Style Pizza Wars: The Trademark Edition Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
5
2021
China’s Supreme People’s Court Affirms Right to Set Royalty Rates Worldwide in OPPO/Sharp Standard Essential Patent Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
4
2021
Belcher v. Hospira – Inequitable Conduct is Still in Your Invalidity Toolbox Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
3
2021
Belmora Petitions for Supreme Court Review of FLANAX Decision Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Sep
3
2021
A Preamble Held Limiting Based on the Patentee’s Arguments in a Prior Appeal and File History Finnegan
Sep
3
2021
Federal Circuit: FOCUSVISION Confusingly Similar to FOCUS Finnegan
Sep
3
2021
Chinese Patent Bar Applicants Hits New High in 2021 – Over 50,000 People Applied to Take the Exam Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
3
2021
Teaching Away May Preclude Motivation to Modify a Reference Finnegan
Sep
3
2021
The Pandemic Isn’t Over, Nor is the USTPO’s Fast Track Program for COVID-Related Inventions Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
2
2021
Patent Owner Tip #17 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: Alternatives to Motions to Amend in IPR Proceedings Mintz
Sep
2
2021
Federal Circuit Upholds Exclusion of Damages Expert Testimony Finnegan
Sep
2
2021
Unhappy Together: No Right of Public Performance under California Copyright Law McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins