| Jun 23 2023 |
Central District of California: Test Buys Do Not Create Specific Jurisdiction |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
| Jun 23 2023 |
Senators Propose New Legislation to Clarify Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Jun 22 2023 |
The Best Option Is Obviously Not the Only Option |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Jun 22 2023 |
False Advertising: Verifiably False Versus Subjective Opinion |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Jun 22 2023 |
Congress Proposes National Commission to Create AI Guardrails |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Jun 22 2023 |
It’s a Hard Rock Life: Guitar-Shaped Hotel Warrants Trademark, but Hilton Doesn’t |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Jun 22 2023 |
A Single Picture Database Is Worth a Thousand Statutory Damages Awards |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Jun 22 2023 |
First Rule of the PTAB? Play by the Rules |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Jun 22 2023 |
Under High Pressure: New Mechanism of Action Can’t Save Drug Administration Claims |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Jun 22 2023 |
What GDPR Requirements Does a Company that Uses Personal Information to Train an Artificial Intelligence (ai) Need to Meet? |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Jun 22 2023 |
Australian Government Contemplates Asimov’s Omnibus |
K&L Gates LLP |
| Jun 22 2023 |
Inventorship Hosed Clean: Contribution, Corroboration and Collaboration Prove Joint Invention |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Jun 22 2023 |
Registering NFTs and Virtual Goods in the UK |
K&L Gates LLP |
| Jun 22 2023 |
Injury v. Discovery: When Copyright Holders Can Recover Damages for Infringement that Occurred More than Three Years Before Discovery of the Infringement |
Stark & Stark |
| Jun 21 2023 |
Sometimes a Banana is Just a Banana: Morford v. Cattelan |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Jun 21 2023 |
Bad Dog! SCOTUS Sides with Jack Daniel’s in Trademark Fight Over “Poop-Themed” Dog Toy |
Miller Canfield |
| Jun 21 2023 |
NIL Tug of War: Evolving State NIL Laws and the Prospects of a Federal NIL Bill |
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP |
| Jun 21 2023 |
Training AI Models – Just Because It’s Your Data Doesn’t Mean You Can Use It |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Jun 21 2023 |
Generative AI and Patent Considerations – Part Two |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Jun 21 2023 |
Don't Miss Out On Patent Term -- Use The USPTO IDS PTA Safe Harbor Form |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Jun 20 2023 |
Spilling Secrets: How to Pursue Damages in Trade Secrets Litigation [PODCAST] |
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. |
| Jun 20 2023 |
The EU’s “AI Act” Advances |
Vedder Price |
| Jun 19 2023 |
The After Effects of the Music Modernization Act in the Digital Streaming Sphere |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Jun 19 2023 |
The inexplicable not explained in UK government’s Response to non-competition consultation |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
| Jun 18 2023 |
District Court Finding Doesn’t Preclude PTAB Proceeding |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Jun 18 2023 |
Absent Nexus Secondary Considerations Come in Second |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Jun 18 2023 |
Quack, Waddle and Duck: Order That Grants Injunctive Relief Is an Injunction |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Jun 18 2023 |
Draft Bill on Name, Image, and Likeness: Uniform Standard Contract, Medical Trust, NCAA Authority |
Jackson Lewis P.C. |
| Jun 17 2023 |
How Big a Deal Is “Trump Too Small”? – SCOTUS Today |
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. |
| Jun 16 2023 |
The Nine Greatest Experts on the Internet, NOT! – The Supreme Court Considers the Algorithm in Google and Twitter |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
| Jun 16 2023 |
In Jack Daniel’s case, Supreme Court Rejects Ninth Circuit’s Expansive View of First Amendment Rogers Test |
Proskauer Rose LLP |
| Jun 16 2023 |
The Supreme Court Weighs in on Jack Daniel’s v. Bad Spaniels |
Norris McLaughlin P.A. |
| Jun 16 2023 |
Update on AI Legal Challenges |
Robinson & Cole LLP |
| Jun 16 2023 |
How a Zero-Day Flaw in MOVEit Led to a Global Ransomware Attack |
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP |
| Jun 16 2023 |
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
