Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Mar
2
2016
Mangrove Partners Master Fund Apple and Black Swamp IP v. VirnetX: Request For Rehearing Granted-In-Part IPR2015-01047 Faegre Drinker
Mar
2
2016
Seagate Technology v. Enova Tech Corp: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Unpatentable Where Patent Owner’s Proposed Claim Construction Was Too Narrow IPR2014-01297 Faegre Drinker
Mar
2
2016
CaptionCall v. Ultratec: Order Denying Authorization For Motion To Request Additional Discovery IPR2015-00636, 00637 Faegre Drinker
Mar
2
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 2, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
1
2016
Core Survival v. S & S Precision - Burden to Establish Earlier Priority Date on Patent Owner in Decision Instituting Post-Grant Review PGR2015-00022 Faegre Drinker
Mar
1
2016
Luv N’ Care v. Munchkin - Petitioner’s Motion to Compel Testimony and Production of Documents To Rebut Motion to Amend Authorized IPR2015-00872 Faegre Drinker
Mar
1
2016
Coalition for Affordable Drugs VII v. Pozen: Denying Institution Where Declaration Testimony Found To Be Unpersuasive IPR2015-01680 Faegre Drinker
Mar
1
2016
Design Patents – Unlocking Value of User Experience Mintz
Mar
1
2016
Emotional Component of Restrictive Covenant Litigation Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Mar
1
2016
Ohio Federal Court Invalidates Cleveland Clinic Diagnostic Patents On Motion To Dismiss Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
1
2016
Harnessing Big Data to Fight Cancer: The Cancer Moonshot Task Force The National Law Review / The National Law Forum LLC - NLR
Mar
1
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 1, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
29
2016
For Your Eyes Only: Protecting The IP Rights of #FoodPorn Valparaiso University Law
Feb
29
2016
Implementing and Applying Employee Choice Doctrine: Employers Focus on Forfeiture to Protect Their Company’s Assets Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
29
2016
Dutch Privacy Watchdog to Nike - You Can't Just Do It Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
29
2016
To Patent or Keep Secret? That Is the Question Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Feb
29
2016
Cami Li Cannot Compete: BPI Sports v. Camila Figueras Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
29
2016
Copyright Suit Alleges Huckabee Campaign Lacks "Eye of the Tiger" Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
29
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 29, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
27
2016
No More Monkey Business in Copyright Law Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
26
2016
Massachusetts: Wisp of a Possibility of Gas Kit Lawsuit May Establish Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
26
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 26, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
25
2016
You Can’t Spell “Pressurized Collection Vessel” Without “Collection”: Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. v. Dow Chem. Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Technologies Corp.: New Party Has No Cause of Action to Appeal PTAB Decision McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
TradeStation Group Securities v. Trading Tech Intl: Covered Business Method Patent Review Instituted CBM2015-00161 Faegre Drinker
Feb
25
2016
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien LP: Same Board Panel May Institute and Finally Decide AIA Review McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
USPTO “Forecloses” on Mortgage Processing Patent under Alice Mintz
Feb
25
2016
Pfizer, Inc. v. Lee: Time Between Original and Corrected Restriction Requirement Nets No Further Patent Term Adjustment McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 25, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
25
2016
Avid Technologies, Inc. v. Harmonic, Inc.: Reversal of Narrow Claim Construction Results in Satisfaction of Claim Element McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Glass Half Full for Russian Federation Successor’s Stolichnaya Infringement Saga McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Trying to Outhustle a Permanent Injunction: LFP IP, LLC v. Hustler Cincinnati, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
CBM Review Not a Venue for Review of Contractual and Tortious Disputes McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Turkish Intellectual Property Court Rules on the Patentability of Genes and Other Nucleic Acid Sequences Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
25
2016
J.P. Morgan Chase LLC V. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: CBM Jurisdiction Survives Abandonment of CBM Claims McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins