Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Mar
31
2016
Silicon Laboratories v. Cresta Tech: Board Requests “List Approach” Over Motion to Strike IPR2015-00615, 00626 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2016
Unenforceability Due to Client Failure to Correct Counsel’s Misrepresentations to PTO McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
In Determining Whether to Apply Intervening Rights, Courts Must Account for Differences Between Claim Construction Standards McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Inconsistent and Confusing Specification Language Does Not Support Broad Claim Construction McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Reformulated OxyContin Patents Invalid McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Absent Contemporaneous Objection to Order for Single Trial on Subset of Claims, No Due Process Violation McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Institutes 17 Inter Partes Reviews for TCL Communication Technology Holdings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2016
Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe Systems Inc.: Pre-Issuance Damages Possible Only If You “Know” About the Published Application McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
20-Year Zoltek Litigation Continues: Federal Circuit Reverses CFC Invalidity Ruling on Written Description, Obviousness Grounds McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
TriReme Med., LLC v. AngioScore, Inc.: Stent Contract Collapses Standing Argument McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Trivascular, Inc. v. Samuels: Even the “Broadest Reasonable Interpretation” Has Limits McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 30, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
30
2016
Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp.: Decision to Institute IPR Need Not Be Binary McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Eon Corp. IP Holdings LLC v. Silver Spring Networks, Inc.: “Plain and Ordinary Meaning” Must Be Tethered to Invention Described in Specification McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG: Federal Circuit Remands PTAB’s Denial of Motion to Amend in IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Patent Agent-Client Privilege: Smartclause? IMS Legal Strategies
Mar
30
2016
Great West Casualty Co. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Disclaimed Claims May Be Disregarded in Considering CBM Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
Preliminary Injunction on Flameless Candle Extinguished McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
Timing Is Everything – Meeting the One-Year Filing Deadline for IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
Yet Another Bite at this Apple: Damages in Design Patent Cases McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
The Estoppel Effects of IPR May Be Significantly Limited Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
29
2016
T.T.A.B. Emphasizes the Fame of the Movie ‘Jaws’ in Its Refusal to Register a Cooking Show’s Mark Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2016
PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Commc’n RF, LLC: Presumptions Can Apply in Inter Partes PTAB Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
PTAB Disinclined to Tailor Protective Orders or Interfere with Protective Orders Issued in Parallel Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
Expediting Patent Prosecution in Brazil Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
29
2016
Foreign IP Litigation Does Not Defeat Presumption of Laches McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
The Smart Phone Patent Saga Continues: Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
First Amendment Prevents Right of Publicity Claim Arising from Film About “Issues of Public Nature” McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
Federal Circuit Limits Estoppel Provision of AIA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2016
NFL Players’ Right of Publicity Claims Denied McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
Financial Gain Not Required to Prevail in Trade Secret Theft Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
Instradent USA v. Nobel Biocare Services AG: Decision Denying Institution Of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-01784 Faegre Drinker
Mar
29
2016
USPTO: Four Reasons to File RCE with Request to Suspend Processing Mintz
Mar
29
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 29, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
29
2016
Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation v. MiMedx Group: Order Authorizing Filing Of Transcript Of Markman Hearing IPR2015-00664 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins