Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jul
27
2016
Patents: Covered Business Method Decisions Show Limits of Enfish McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
PTAB Denies Priority Claim, Has No Affinity for “Antibody Rule" McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
Trademarks: Raise Glass to Single Dispositive DuPont Factor McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
26
2016
Burning Man Bus Not a Protected Work of Visual Art Under Visual Artists Rights Act McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
26
2016
Kirtsaeng II: Fees in Copyright Cases Depend on Reasonableness of Litigation Position McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
26
2016
Injunction Ruled Too Narrow in Trademark Infringement Case: Not What the Doctor Ordered McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
26
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 26, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
26
2016
Trademark Professionals - Are You Brand Obsessed? Take This Quiz to Find Out! Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2016
Dealing With Trade Secret Thieves: Strategies for Cost-Effective Settlement Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
25
2016
Nevada’s High Court Won’t Get Out Its Pencil To Save Overbroad Noncompete Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
25
2016
Protecting Your Trade Secrets: A New Tool You Can Use [Video] Murtha Cullina
Jul
25
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 25, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
23
2016
LED Dispute Blazes Through Summary Judgment Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
22
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 22, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
22
2016
Nevada Supreme Court Refuses To “Blue Pencil” Unreasonable Non-Compete Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jul
21
2016
Supreme Court Reinvigorates Effectiveness of Obtaining an Opinion of Counsel to Defend against Potential Enhanced Damages for Willful Infringement in Halo Electronics Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Jul
21
2016
The Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act vs. The California Uniform Trade Secrets Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
21
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 21, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
21
2016
English High Court: ISPs Ordered to Block Websites Infringing Trademarks and Must Pay for Implementation Covington & Burling LLP
Jul
21
2016
Can FDA Implement Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act As Federal Circuit Suggested? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
21
2016
Could the Flying Car Finally Take Off? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
20
2016
Australia: Update on Patentability of Diagnostic Claims (Part 1) Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
20
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 20, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
19
2016
Getting the Correct Named Inventors on Patent: IP for Start-Ups, Part VI [VIDEO] Mintz
Jul
19
2016
En Banc Federal Circuit Requires Uniform Commercial Code Sale For On Sale Bar Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
18
2016
Can You Identify Your Trade Dress? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
18
2016
Sweeping Changes in EU Trademark Law and the Brexit Unknown Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jul
18
2016
Response to UK Department for Business, Innovation and Skills Call for Evidence on Restrictive Covenants Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
18
2016
Patent Due Diligence and Evaluation After America Invents Act Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
18
2016
USPTO Patent Eligibility Guidance In View Of CellzDirect And Sequenom Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
15
2016
In CellzDirect, the Federal Circuit Offers New Tools to Combat Patent Eligibility Challenges Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
15
2016
Federal Circuit Defines Supplier Exemption to the On-Sale Bar Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
15
2016
Patent Office Adds Another After Final Option for Applicants – P3 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
14
2016
Federal Trade Commission Continues to Scrutinize Social Media Influencer Programs Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jul
14
2016
Why Should Automotive Industry Care About Intellectual Property? IP Part 1 Varnum LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins