Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Sep
6
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 6, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
6
2016
Delaware District Court Upholds Eligibility Of Personalized Medicine Method Claims For FANAPT Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
6
2016
Brexit: International and EU Legal Frameworks Affected and Unaffected Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Sep
2
2016
Design Patents and Copyrights for Designs on Useful Articles Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
2
2016
Need for Illumination of Maximum Recovery Rule Warrants Interlocutory Appeal Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
2
2016
September 2016 Update - gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
2
2016
Scent Trademarks: Have Sense About Scents Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
2
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 2, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
1
2016
Apotex v Wyeth Explores Structural Obviousness Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
1
2016
Proposed Update of the Antitrust Guidelines for Licensing Intellectual Property: FTC and DOJ Seek Public Comment Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
1
2016
ITC Declines to File Petition for Certiorari – CAFC Holding ITC Does Not Have Jurisdiction over Digital Imports Stands Mintz
Sep
1
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 1, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
31
2016
Brexit and Your Trade Marks – Some Practical Questions Answered Faegre Drinker
Aug
31
2016
Protect Your Automotive Industry Intellectual Property or Else: IP Part 2 Varnum LLP
Aug
30
2016
Ninth Circuit to District Court on Trademarks: Pucker Up for a Remand McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2016
Estoppel Prevents Second IPR Petition Even When New References Were Missed By First Search Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
30
2016
Summary Judgment Ruling Affirmed as Bench Trial Decision McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2016
PTAB Grants Patent Owner Motion to Request Certificate of Correction McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2016
“Providing . . . Information” to Medical Providers Is Not Given Patentable Weight McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 30, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
30
2016
Retroactive Estoppel: Acting as Real Party in Interest May Import Estoppel Effects from Earlier-Filed Petitions McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2016
PTO Initiates Post-Prosecution Pilot Program McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2016
Biosimilar FDA Approvals on Horizon As More States Enact Substitution Laws Mintz
Aug
30
2016
Federal Circuit Will Review PTAB Rules for Claim Amendments in AIA Reviews McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2016
“Crazy Horse” Trademark Still Going Crazy in Las Vegas McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2016
Federal Circuit Rules Device Patent Claims Not Limited by Specification Description, Not Invalid for Lack of Written Description Covington & Burling LLP
Aug
30
2016
Help USPTO Leverage Prior Art From Related Patent Applications Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
29
2016
Indefiniteness of Means-Plus-Function Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Indirect Infringement Not Overcome by Objective Strength of Non-Infringement Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Prevailing Party Before PTAB May Not Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Patent Infringement Claim Exempts Related Counterclaims from Mandatory Arbitration McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Concerted Actions with Sister Company in Finland Result in Delaware Jurisdiction McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act 180-Day Notice of Intent to Market a Biosimilar Is Required, Enforceable by Injunction McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
BASCOM Global Internet v. ATT Mobility: Specific, Discrete Implementation of Abstract Idea Is Patent Eligible McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Amendments to Indonesian Patent Law Come into Effect Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins