Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Sep
29
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 29, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
29
2016
Music Played by Karaoke Machine Is Not “Tangible Good” for Purpose of Trademark Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
Exclusive Recitation of Specific Device in Specification Limits Claim Term McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
Wi-LAN USA v. Apple Inc: Claim Differentiation Doctrine Does Not Overcome Construction Dictated by Written Description or Prosecution History McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
Unwrapping the Meaning of Markush Group Claim Construction Language McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
Reduced Design Fees for UK Design Protection in Effect from 1 October 2016 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
29
2016
In Autoimmune Disorder Diagnosis Patent Case, Section 101 Motion to Dismiss Denied Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
28
2016
Patent Infringement: Once Again, Written Description Does Not Limit Claim Scope McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Corrected Inventorship Leads to Loss of Standing to Pursue Infringement Case McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
PTAB Refusal to Permit Claim Amendments Remanded McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Army Ammunition Goes Green and Infringement Free McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
IPR Stay Factors and Explaining Preliminary Injunction Rationale McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Generalized Common Sense Allegations Cannot Be Used to Supply Important Missing Claim Limitation McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
PTAB Must Provide Explanation in Support of Conclusory Findings McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Copyright Infringement – Plaintiff Not Required to Prove Copies Are Unauthorized McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Iron Man Composer Battles Tech Giant Sony and Ghostface Killah McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Double-Checking Alice Using Common-Sense Distinctions Between Ends and Means McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Ninth Circuit Provides a Second Look at Willful Copyright Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 28, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
28
2016
The Halo Effect: Original Halo Case Remanded to District Court to Consider New Test for Enhanced Damages McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Inherent Disclosure Supports Priority Claim: Yeda Research and Development Co. v. Abbott GmbH and Co. Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
28
2016
EU – When Will Hyperlinks Be Unlawful? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
27
2016
Federal Circuit Allows New Evidence After Institution Armstrong Teasdale
Sep
27
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 27, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
26
2016
Vanda v. Roxane Labs. – Are Two Natural Laws Better Than One? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
26
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 26, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
25
2016
NDA Alert: Modify Your Non-Disclosure Agreements to Preserve All Remedies Under the New Federal Trade Secrets Statute ArentFox Schiff LLP
Sep
23
2016
Double Patenting Decision Delivers Bitter Pill To Antibody Patent Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
23
2016
Speaking the Language of the Trademark Office: Descriptions of Goods and Services Faegre Drinker
Sep
23
2016
Virtual Porn – Real Patent Lawsuit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
23
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 23, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
23
2016
Accelerated Examination of Patent Applications in Argentina Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
22
2016
Willfulness of Patent Infringement After Halo: Now What? Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
22
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 22, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
22
2016
In McRO, Federal Circuit Provides Further Guidance on Section 101 Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins