Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Oct
6
2016
Know Thy Software Vendor: Website Operator Cannot Sidestep Copyright Infringement Claims over Link to Allegedly Infringing Software Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
6
2016
Final Judgment Prescribed For Antibody Patent After Double Patenting Decision Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
6
2016
Second Circuit Jury Awards Tiffany & Co. Punitive Damages of $8.24 Million in Costco Infringement Case Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
5
2016
Sovereign Immunity of State Universities: Can It Shield Them from AIA Patent Challenges? Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
5
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 5, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
5
2016
Test Your Daubert Skills: Will "Liability Likelihood" Royalty Calculation Get Through? IMS Legal Strategies
Oct
5
2016
Judge Grants Gilead Motion To Invalidate Remicade Patent For Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
4
2016
Accused Infringer Secures Patent Invalidity in Eyeglass Screw Case Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
4
2016
FedEx Color Scheme Trademark: Beyond Black and White Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
4
2016
Protegrity Teaches Timing is Important When Negotiating Settlement Agreements: Think Before You Settle Mintz
Oct
4
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 4, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
4
2016
Supreme Court Review of “Disparagement” Trademark Case May – Or May Not – Implicate First Amendment, Impact Washington Redskins Case Dickinson Wright PLLC
Oct
3
2016
Five Things Academic Scientists Should Know When Pursuing Their First Patent – Five-Part Series Mintz
Oct
3
2016
Spokeo and "No-Injury" Class Actions in Wisconsin Courts Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
3
2016
Federal Circuit Finds Claims Implemented on General Purpose Cellphone Not Patentable Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
3
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 3, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
3
2016
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Redskins’ Petition to Join SLANTS Case Mintz
Oct
3
2016
Ukraine’s Competition Authority Issues Major Decision on Drug Pricing Practices Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
30
2016
CAFC’s Husky Decision Makes Sledding Tougher for Patent Owners in PTAB Appeals Mintz
Sep
30
2016
Supreme Court Set to Settle Dispute over Washington Redskins Trademark Registration Varnum LLP
Sep
30
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 30, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
30
2016
Federal Patent-Agent Privilege Not Recognized in Texas State Courts McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2016
Patent Rights in the U.S.: Is the Pendulum Finally Swinging Back to Center? Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
30
2016
Incomplete Preemption Does Not Result in Patent-Eligible Subject Matter McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2016
PTO Must Apply Phillips Standard when Construing Expired Patents McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
“Processing System” Does Not Render Claims Indefinite Mintz
Sep
29
2016
Post-Grant Review May Be Used to Invalidate Patents Directed to Patent-Ineligible Subject Matter McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
Federal Circuit Revisits Willfulness Post Halo Mintz
Sep
29
2016
A Graphical User Interface Situation for Covered Business Method McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
The SLANTS Trademark Will Play One More Gig: U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of Ban on Disparaging Trademarks Mintz
Sep
29
2016
PTAB Rejects Consideration of New Issues on Remand McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
No Post-Trial “Bait-and-Switch” on Legal Theory in Trademark Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
CBM Review Denied for Technological Invention Directed to Financial Product McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
Trader Woes: Lanham Act Applies Extraterritorially to Canadian Resale of US Grocery Chain’s Products McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
Don’t Let Your Color Trade Dress Protection Fade Away McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins