Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Oct
24
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 24, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
24
2016
Three Guidelines to Maximize Value of Data Mintz
Oct
24
2016
Federal Circuit Clarifies When Claim Scope is Disavowed Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
21
2016
Analyzing Patent Claims Having Conditional Language – the PTAB Provides Clarity Mintz
Oct
21
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 21, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
20
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 20, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
20
2016
USPTO Makes It Easy To Review Patent Assignment Documents Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
20
2016
Intellectual Property: Review of Compulsory Licenses in Colombia Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
19
2016
Timing Is Everything: Successful Joinder Motions At The PTAB Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
19
2016
Deciding Between Principal and Supplemental Register Registration: "Principal” of Matter Faegre Drinker
Oct
19
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 19, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
18
2016
Another Friendly Reminder from the CAFC – Use of “the Present Invention” is Clear and Unequivocal Evidence of Disavowal Mintz
Oct
18
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 18, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
18
2016
Higher US Patent Fees On The Horizon Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
17
2016
Australian Court Orders Former Customers and Builder to Pay Damages to Henley for Copying its House Plan K&L Gates
Oct
17
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 17, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
17
2016
Practical Implications from the Federal Circuit’s Rare en Banc Reversal in Apple v. Samsung K&L Gates
Oct
14
2016
Proposed New FDA Labeling Rules Would Result in Increased Generic Drug Product Liability Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
14
2016
FTC and DOJ Issue Proposed Updates to Antitrust Guidelines for Licensing IP Mintz
Oct
14
2016
New PTAB Bar Association: What's in Store IMS Legal Strategies
Oct
13
2016
FTC Report on Patent Assertion Entities Recommends Patent Litigation Reform McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
13
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 13, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
12
2016
Supreme Court Refuses to Consider Constitutionality of IPR Review Armstrong Teasdale
Oct
12
2016
Pleading Standard Defined– Federal Circuit Holds Joint Infringement Complaint Requires Identification of All Required Claim Steps Mintz
Oct
12
2016
Hilsinger Co v. Eyeego: Accused Infringer Puts Screws on Patentee Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
12
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 12, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
12
2016
Smartphone Patent War: En Banc Federal Circuit Rebukes Earlier Panel Decision and Reinstates Jury Verdicts for Apple against Samsung McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
11
2016
Federal Circuit Affirms 101 Ineligibility of a Patent Claiming Detection of Unauthorized Access to Medical Information Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
11
2016
FTC Releases Report on Patent Assertion Entities, Calls for Reforms to Reduce Nuisance Patent Lawsuits Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
11
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 11, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
11
2016
Hillary Clinton's Intellectual Property Litigation Experience Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
11
2016
PTAB Upholds Lialda Patent Over Kyle Bass IPR Challenge Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
10
2016
Supreme Court and the Lanham Act: Lee v Tam Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2016
Elvis and Prince: Personality Rights Guidance for Dead Celebrities and the Lawyers and Legislatures Who Protect Them Northeastern University School of Law
Oct
10
2016
Supreme Court Refuses to Consider Patents Invalidated Under Mayo/Alice Framework: High Court Takes High Road on Patent Eligibility Bracewell LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins