Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jan
17
2017
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 17, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
17
2017
TTAB's Finding of No Use in Commerce for Web-Based Mark is Vacated for Not Focusing on Perception of User Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jan
16
2017
Plaintiff Unable to Meet Relaxed Standard Under Akamai for Direct Infringement of Method Claims Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jan
16
2017
Federal Circuit: Inequitable Conduct is Not Warranted Without Evidence of Materiality of Withheld Document to the Patent Office Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jan
16
2017
Two Important Decisions Addressing ANVISA’s Prior Approval of Pharmaceutical Patents in Brazil Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
16
2017
Supreme Court Will Judge Biosimilar Patent Dance Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
13
2017
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 13, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
12
2017
Lee v. Tam: January 18 Panel Discussion on Supreme Court Oral Argument Faegre Drinker
Jan
12
2017
Pizza! Pizza!: Little Caesar’s Repeated Term Slogans Are Not a “Family of Marks” Mintz
Jan
12
2017
Intellectual Property Cases to Watch in 2017 Mintz
Jan
12
2017
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 12, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
12
2017
Supreme Court Declines to Revisit Broad Personal Jurisdiction Over ANDA Filers Mintz
Jan
11
2017
Australia Trademark Dispute: An Apple a Day Doesn’t Keep Litigation at Bay K&L Gates
Jan
11
2017
Federal Circuit Dismisses IPR Appeal for Lack of Standing Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
11
2017
Pink or Orange: Colors That Are the By-Product of a Functional Improvement to a Product Are Not Entitled to Trade Dress Protection Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
11
2017
U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Arguments on January 18, 2017 in “The Slants” Case. Mintz
Jan
11
2017
2016-2017 Technical Review of Australian Gene Technology Regulations 2001 K&L Gates
Jan
11
2017
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 11, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
10
2017
Federal Circuit Finds IPR Petitioner Lacks Standing To Appeal Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
10
2017
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board: Non-Spanish Speakers Would Confuse PATRON and PORTON Trademarks Mintz
Jan
10
2017
How Big Pharma Taps Outside Ingenuity Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jan
10
2017
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 10, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
10
2017
Software as Service (SAAS): Is It Goods or Service? K&L Gates
Jan
10
2017
Permanent Injunction Not Overly Broad Where Plaintiff Would Not Enforce Injunction Against Noninfringing Uses Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jan
9
2017
Simple Steps to Help Keep Your Trade Secrets Safe Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
9
2017
Data Privacy – Commission Changes Existing Decisions on Standard Contractual Clauses and Adequacy of Third Countries Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
6
2017
ClassCo, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.: A Reminder Of Obviousness Analysis Under KSR Mintz
Jan
6
2017
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 6, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
5
2017
Federal Circuit Rejects Broad Eligibility For CBM Review, Adds to Program Uncertainty Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jan
5
2017
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 5, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
4
2017
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 4, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
3
2017
New York Court of Appeals Says No Common Law Public Performance Right For Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
3
2017
Is Broadest Reasonable Interpretation of Claim Terms, as Applied in Inter Partes Review, Converging on Standard Applied in Litigation? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
3
2017
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 3, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
3
2017
EPO Stays Proceedings Over Patentability Of Plants And Animals Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins