Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Feb
9
2017
Intellectual Properties Owners Association Proposes Legislative Fix for s. 101. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
9
2017
Changes to the IP Landscape in Turkey-Industrial Designs Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
9
2017
Trade Secret Misappropriation Rights: Defend Trade Secrets Act Stark & Stark
Feb
8
2017
New Rules in Ninth Circuit Aim to Encourage Patent Case Settlements Mintz
Feb
8
2017
PTO Litigation Report – February 8, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
8
2017
One Fee Per Class System Introduced in Polish Trademark Law K&L Gates
Feb
7
2017
Even in Light of Reexam, Massachusetts Court Declines to Stay Brite-Strike Patent Litigation Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
7
2017
Federal Circuit Sends Back Overbroad Preliminary Injunction Order Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
7
2017
PTO Litigation Report – February 7, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
7
2017
Federal Circuit Court Rejects Theory Of Derivation Based On FDA Requirement Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
6
2017
When Does a Suggestion Become an Invention? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
6
2017
AKAMAI V – “How To” Induce Infringement of a Method of Treatment Claim Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
6
2017
PTO Litigation Report – February 6, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
6
2017
New Year’s Resolution – Be Compliant With Digital Millennium Copyright Act! Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
6
2017
Are Patent-Friendly PTAB Decisions On the Rise? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
6
2017
Intellectual Property: Importance of Renown and Proof Thereof K&L Gates
Feb
3
2017
PTO Litigation Report – February 3, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
3
2017
Continuing Uncertainty in a Survey of IPR Estoppel Decisions under § 315(e)(2) Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
2
2017
Changes to the IP Landscape in Turkey – Patents and Utility Models Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
2
2017
Graphical User Interface Improvements Without Pre-Electronic Analog Found Patent Eligible Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
2
2017
Texas District Court Correctly Analyzed Likelihood of Success and Irreparable Harm Elements When Granting Preliminary Injunction Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
2
2017
Antidote for Acetaminophen Overdoses Not Invalid as Either Derived From Another or Obvious Over the Prior Art Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
2
2017
Patent Owner’s Challenge to Wayback Machine Evidence Fails Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
2
2017
Ninth Circuit’s Recent Patent Local Rules Amendments: Elevating Damages Considerations to Same Level as Infringement and Invalidity Contentions Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
2
2017
PTO Litigation Report – February 2, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
2
2017
Patent Infringement: Injunction Against Third Party Maintained Pending Remand McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
2
2017
Factual Dispute Defeats Summary Judgment on Inherent Anticipation McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
2
2017
Default Judgment Affirmed for Unreasonable, Dilatory Discovery Conduct McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
2
2017
Power Integrations v. Fairchild Semiconductor: On Appeal, Patent Infringement Ruling Gets the Jitters McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
1
2017
Setting Up the Scope of IPR Estoppel for the Federal Circuit K&L Gates
Feb
1
2017
PTAB Provides A Possible Roadmap For Patent Owners To Successfully Argue Secondary Considerations Of Nonobvious Mintz
Feb
1
2017
Why Some State-Funded Institutions May Not Be Subject to Inter Partes Review Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
1
2017
PTAB Sanctions Successful IPR Petitioner, Awards Fees to Patent Owner McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
1
2017
“Inventive Concept” Requires Specific Use of Computer Components Beyond Their Generic Use McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
1
2017
To the Federal Circuit, Some PTAB Petitioners Have No Appeal Whatsoever K&L Gates
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins