Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Mar
24
2017
Supreme Court Rejects Laches as Bar to Damages for Timely Asserted Patent Infringement Claims Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
24
2017
Supreme Court Resolves Split on Design Copyright Eligibility Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
24
2017
The Supreme Court Holds that Laches Can No Longer Be Used as a Defense Against Damages Claims in Patent Cases Brought within the Patent Act’s Six-Year Limitations Period Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
24
2017
Supreme Court Decision Arms Clothing Designers with 'Powerful Tool' Polsinelli PC
Mar
24
2017
Supreme Court Outlines New Test for Copyrightability of Useful Articles Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
24
2017
US Supreme Court Knocks out the Equitable Defense of Laches in Patent Law McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
24
2017
“Knock-Offs” Beware: SCOTUS Makes a Fashion-Forward Decision Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
23
2017
Timing is Everything: U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Patent Act Does Not Provide Laches Remedy for Limiting Damages Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
23
2017
Supreme Court Copyright Decision: When Clothing Is a Work of Art Vedder Price
Mar
23
2017
Planning for International Trade Secret Protection Polsinelli PC
Mar
23
2017
Hip, Hip, Hooray for Copyrightable Decorative Elements Katten
Mar
23
2017
U.S. Supreme Court Rules on Copyright Protection for Cheerleader Uniform Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
23
2017
Supreme Court Decision Alters Patent Defense Landscape Polsinelli PC
Mar
23
2017
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Cheerleader Uniform Elements May be Eligible for Copyright Protection K&L Gates
Mar
22
2017
Supreme Court Holds that Laches Cannot Bar a Claim for Damages Incurred Within the Patent Act’s Six-year Limitation Period Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
22
2017
Sections 101 and 112: Eligibility, Patentability, or Somewhere in Between? Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
22
2017
Global Dossier Expanded To More Patent Applications Around the World Mintz
Mar
22
2017
Supreme Court Tosses Laches Defense To Patent Damages Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
21
2017
Supreme Court Shuts the Door on Patent Laches Mintz
Mar
21
2017
Federal Circuit Invalidates Claim to Generating “Financial Risk” Reports Mintz
Mar
20
2017
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act Helps Amgen Gain Dismissal of Genentech Complaint Mintz
Mar
20
2017
Federal Circuit Reverses PTAB’s Holding of Anticipation Despite an Element Missing from the Prior Art Mintz
Mar
20
2017
gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open- February 28, 2017 Updated List Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
20
2017
Navigating Lifecycle of Eponymous Brand (Part 1) Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
17
2017
Are Biosimilars Really That Similar? The $40B Question IMS Legal Strategies
Mar
16
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 16, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
16
2017
Federal Circuit Reiterates That Patent Prosecution Disclaimers Must Be “Clear and Unmistakable” Mintz
Mar
15
2017
The CAFC Vacated the Northern District of California’s Claim Construction Because the District Court Improperly Limited the Claims Based on Prosecution History Disclaimer Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
15
2017
Federal Circuit Vacated a PTAB Finding of Obviousness Because, by Providing an Overly Broad Construction, the PTAB Read Key Limitations Out of the Claims Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
15
2017
A Prior Art Reference that Merely Suggests the Claimed Subject Matter Does Not Anticipate the Claims Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
15
2017
When The Examiner Agrees With an Attorney’s Argument Presented in an Inter Partes Reexamination, But Cites to No Substantial Evidence, There is No Factual Basis for the Examiner’s Finding that Patent Claims are Unpatentable as Being Obvious Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
15
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 15, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
14
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 14, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
14
2017
Trademark Traps for Unwary, Part 1: Black-and-White Registrations Abroad are a Gray Area Faegre Drinker
Mar
14
2017
Biosimilar Remedies Not Limited Without Full Patent Dance Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins