Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Mar
31
2017
In re Google: Co-Pending Litigation Is Not Sufficient Basis to Deny Transfer Motion McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
ABA-IPL Section Proposes Amendments to s. 101 – Too much of a “Good Thing”? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
30
2017
Standard for Inventorship: Five Things Academic Scientists Should Know When Pursuing Their First Patent – Part II of V Mintz
Mar
30
2017
Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Copyright Protection for Features of Useful Articles Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Mar
30
2017
Octane Fitness Does Not Provide a Set Formula For Determining Whether to Grant Attorney Fees. Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
30
2017
Potential Error in Jury Verdict with Respect to Non-Infringement Is Harmless Where Invalidity Is Affirmed Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
30
2017
ITC Sanctions for “Staggering” Destruction of Evidence Upheld McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
No Common Law “Public Performance Right” for Broadcast of Pre-1972 Recordings McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Downloading Pirated Software Without Installing It May Constitute Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Personal Web Technologies v. Apple: Obviousness Does Not Speak for Itself McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Incorporation by Reference Used to Arrive at BRI Claim Construction McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Why You Should Use USPTO’s Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form Mintz
Mar
30
2017
Factual Findings Required to Show “Apparent Reason to Combine” in Patent Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Federal Circuit Evaluates PTAB Reliance on Expert Testimony to Satisfy Substantial Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 30, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
29
2017
Will 30 Years Of Practice Be Overturned? Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument In TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods. Mintz
Mar
29
2017
Janssen v. Celltrion, Damages: “Patent Dance” May Determine Availability of Lost Profits Mintz
Mar
29
2017
Metalcraft of Mayville v. The Toro: Appellate Court Mows Down Objections to Preliminary Injunction McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2017
Giving Patent Enforcement Personal Touch May Create Personal Jurisdiction McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 29, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
29
2017
Export of Single Component of Patented Combination Does Not Impose Liability Under § 271(f)(1) McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2017
Let’s Go, Big ©! Let’s Go! U.S. Supreme Court Backs Copyright Protection for Cheerleading Uniforms Mintz
Mar
28
2017
Mobile Payment Patent Remains Legal Tender after Alice Challenge Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
28
2017
U.S. Customs Seizes Multiple Shipments from China for Infringement of U.S. Intellectual Property Rights Polsinelli PC
Mar
28
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 28, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
27
2017
Who’s Got the Spirit?! Supreme Court Decides Star Athletic v. Varsity Brands; New Two-Part Test Seeks to Clear Up “Mess” But Questions Still Remain About Subjective Nature of Separability Analysis Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
27
2017
Elsevier Wins Summary Judgment Over Use of 3-D Medical Animations in Copyright Case Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
27
2017
US Supreme Court Removes Laches Defense in Patent Infringement Vedder Price
Mar
27
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 27, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
26
2017
Supreme Court Eliminates Laches Defense in Patent Cases K&L Gates
Mar
24
2017
Supreme Court Finds Cheerleading Uniform Designs Copyrightable Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
24
2017
Copyright Rah-Rah: High Court Issues Decision in Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
24
2017
Give Me a ©!: Supreme Court Holds that Copyright Protects Decorative Elements of Useful Articles Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
24
2017
To Seek Design Protection or Not, That is the Question! Mintz
Mar
24
2017
Supreme Court Rejects Laches Defense in Patent Cases Proskauer Rose LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins