Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jun
28
2017
Garmin Succeeds In Navico Patent Suit IMS Legal Strategies
Jun
28
2017
PTO Litigation Report – June 28, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
28
2017
Is A Racial Or Ethnic Group A “Person”? Matal v. Tam Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jun
27
2017
Federal Circuit Holds that the USPTO May Recover Attorneys’ Fees in Actions Under 35 U.S.C. § 145 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
27
2017
Federal Circuit Finds Inventor Testimony Inadequate to Establish A Common Inventive Entity Under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
27
2017
PTO Litigation Report – June 27, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
27
2017
Incorporating Under A Disparaging Name Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jun
27
2017
Does Amgen Have Viable State Law Claims Against Sandoz Arising From The Zarxio Biosimilar Patent Dispute? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
26
2017
The Slants Win in Matal v. Tam:Trademark Registration Cannot Be Denied for Offensive Terms Vedder Price
Jun
26
2017
PTO Litigation Report – June 26, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
26
2017
“Giving Offense is a Viewpoint”: Supreme Court Holds It Is Viewpoint Discrimination To Deny Trademark Protection For Allegedly Offensive Marks Dickinson Wright PLLC
Jun
26
2017
USPTO Extends Cancer Immunotherapy Pilot Program Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
23
2017
Judge Orders Magic Leap to Be More Precise In Describing the Trade Secrets Former Executive Allegedly Stole Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jun
23
2017
PTO Litigation Report – June 23, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
23
2017
ITC Issues Public Commission Opinion Clarifying Methodology for Allocating Domestic Industry Expenses and Issuing Exclusion Order against Product with Medical Applications Mintz
Jun
23
2017
Supreme Court to Decide the Constitutionality of Inter Partes Review Mintz
Jun
23
2017
Calculating Patent Term Adjustment: Part 1 Mintz
Jun
22
2017
SCOTUS to Decide 2: Are AIA Patent Reviews Constitutional? Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jun
22
2017
PTO Litigation Report – June 22, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
22
2017
Is Congress Finally Getting Serious About Curtailing Design Patents in Auto Industry? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
21
2017
Supreme Court Holds Entities May Register Disparaging Trademarks Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jun
21
2017
Central District of California Analyzes Equitable Estoppel and Laches in View of Supreme Court’s Recent Laches Ruling Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
21
2017
PTO Litigation Report – June 21, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
21
2017
Lack of Distinctiveness as an Obstacle for EUTM Registration K&L Gates
Jun
20
2017
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals' Decision Reins in Copyright Infringement Claims Relating to Home Designs von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Jun
20
2017
Supreme Court Analyzes Key Provisions of Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
20
2017
Computer-Based Publishing Patent Goes Offline after Alice Inquiry Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
20
2017
A New Slant: Supreme Court Invalidates Bar to Registering “Disparaging” Trademarks Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
20
2017
Matal v. Tam: U.S. Supreme Court Holds Prohibition on Disparaging Trademarks Unconstitutional under First Amendment Mintz
Jun
20
2017
Supreme Court Slants in Favor of Rock Band in Landmark Trademark Case Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
20
2017
SCOTUS Decision Reaffirms Free Speech in Disparaging Trademarks ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
20
2017
PTO Litigation Report – June 20, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
20
2017
Cleveland Clinic Decision Highlights Catch-22 Of Personalized Medicine Patents Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
19
2017
Are Inter Partes Reviews “Quintessential” Agency Adjudications? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
19
2017
Supreme Court Rules That Prohibition on Registration of Disparaging Trademarks is Unconstitutional Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins