Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Aug
10
2017
Maryland Amends Personal Information Protection Act Jackson Lewis P.C.
Aug
9
2017
No Grey Areas in Supreme Court’s Interpretation of Trade Mark Criminal Offenses Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
9
2017
Advocate General Opinion on Software Medical Devices Covington & Burling LLP
Aug
8
2017
USITC Remands ALJ’s Enforcement Decision to Address Infringement Issues Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
8
2017
PTAB Obviousness Determination Vacated and Remanded for Flawed Analysis of Unexpected Results Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
8
2017
Summary of Recently Introduced “Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2017” Covington & Burling LLP
Aug
8
2017
Voluntary Recall of Duodenoscope Issued Due to Infection Risk Stark & Stark
Aug
8
2017
Impression Products v. Lexmark Intl: Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion Limits Restraints on Alienation of Goods Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Aug
8
2017
A Look At The USPTO Patent Eligible Subject Matter Report Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
8
2017
Eighth Circuit Finds Independent Contractor’s Non-Compete Unreasonable Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Aug
7
2017
Duty of Examining a Mark in the Registration Stage – Judgement of the EU Court in the Case of Indeutsch International, Case T-20/16 K&L Gates
Aug
7
2017
Illinois District Court Continues Trend Toward Broader Interpretation of IPR-Estoppel Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
7
2017
USPTO Issues Report on Public Views Regarding Subject Matter Eligibility K&L Gates
Aug
4
2017
What is a Robot under EU Law? Covington & Burling LLP
Aug
4
2017
PTO Litigation Report – August 4, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
3
2017
Update on FCC Privacy Rules Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
3
2017
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Mexichem Amanco Holdings – Revenge of the Chemist Judges II Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
3
2017
Department of Justice Releases Guidance for Vulnerability Disclosure Programs Covington & Burling LLP
Aug
3
2017
California Bill Poised to Change Regime Governing the Internet of Things Covington & Burling LLP
Aug
3
2017
U.S. International Trade Commission Will Not Bar Hoverboards Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
3
2017
Federal Circuit Affirms Inequitable Conduct Ruling Imposed in Part as Sanction for Litigation Misconduct Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
3
2017
PTO Litigation Report – August 3, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
3
2017
Revolution in Personal Data Protection: GDPR – New Provisions, Bigger Penalties K&L Gates
Aug
2
2017
Fairness in Evaluation: Federal Circuit Remand Back to Board For Failure to Fully Consider Petitioner’s Arguments Against Motion to Amend Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
2
2017
PTO Litigation Report – August 2, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
2
2017
Post-Heartland Denial Of Venue Change Heartless? IMS Legal Strategies
Aug
2
2017
Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales Gives Thoughts on Development of Law for Digital Businesses K&L Gates
Aug
1
2017
Design Patent PTO Litigation Statistics (through July 1, 2017) Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
1
2017
Brewers & Blades: Avoiding Exhaustion in Products with Consumable Parts Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
1
2017
Summer's Here, Don't Get Burned! Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
1
2017
Sports Bras and Tires - What Do They Have In Common? Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
1
2017
3 Tips For Thinking Like An Examiner To Maximize Your Consumer Products Patent's Shelf Life Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
1
2017
PTO Litigation Report – August 1, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
1
2017
Federal Circuit Finds Regeneron Transgenic Mouse Patent Invalid For Inequitable Conduct With Intent Inferred From Litigation Misconduct Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
1
2017
Louis Vuitton Seeks Supreme Court Review to Resolve Purported Circuit Split on Trademark Dilution K&L Gates
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins