Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Aug
30
2017
Second Circuit Upholds Uber’s Mobile Contracting Process, Establishing Template for Mobile Online Contracting Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
30
2017
PTAB’s Consideration of Prior Art Needs a Tune Up: Shinn Fu Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
Stone-Cold Circuit Split on Award of Trademark Profits: Stone Creek Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
PTO Litigation Report – August 30, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
30
2017
Sovereign Immunity Cannot Protect Patent Co-Owned by Private Party: Reactive Surfaces Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
Federal Circuit in Visual Memory Struggles with Alice Test (Part Two) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
30
2017
Trademark 103: Should You Register 3D? IMS Legal Strategies
Aug
30
2017
Federal Circuit in Visual Memory Struggles with Alice Test (Part One) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
30
2017
Obviousness Reversed for Clear Error in Factual Findings on Combination of References McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
Obviousness Does Not Require Absolute Predictability: Soft Gel Tech v. Jarrow Formulas McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
Disclosed Structure Restricts Breadth of Means-Plus-Function Limitations McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
Home Is Where Copyright Non-Infringement Is: Design Basics v. Lexington Homes McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2017
Pre-Merger Intentional Waiver of Privilege Can Extend to Post-Merger Communications: OptumInsight Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2017
Cardiovascular Disease Correlation Doesn’t Beat § 101 Challenge: Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. True Health Diagnostics McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2017
Counsel’s Actions Support Inference of Intent to Deceive PTO: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals v. Merus N.V. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2017
Driving Demand: Causal Nexus Between Infringing Features, Accused Sales Required to Prove Irreparable Harm: Genband US v. Metaswitch Networks McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2017
PTO Litigation Report – August 29, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
29
2017
Damages Recovery for Trade Secrets Misappropriation: What’s New York’s State of Mind? McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2017
Delaware Amends Data Breach Notification Law to Require Credit Monitoring, Attorney General Notification Covington & Burling LLP
Aug
29
2017
Summary Judgment “Disfavored” for Resolving Fair Use Trademark Defense: Marketquest Group v. BIC Corp McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2017
Delaware Court Holds that Trademark License Cannot be Assigned Without Consent Mintz
Aug
29
2017
CAFC Vacates USPTO Single Reference Obviousness Rejection For Inadequate Showing Of Expectation of Success Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
28
2017
US Launches Investigation into China’s Technology Transfer & IP Practices Covington & Burling LLP
Aug
28
2017
PTO Litigation Report – August 28, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
28
2017
How Distinctive Can a Chocolate Bar be? After Kit Kat, Now It’s Toblerone’s Turn K&L Gates
Aug
25
2017
Court Bounces Untimely Extrinsic Evidence in Claim Construction Phase Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
25
2017
PTO Litigation Report – August 25, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
25
2017
CFIUS Filing Clearance: Micro Focus International Plc and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Software Business Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
25
2017
Indian Supreme Court Declares the Right to Privacy a Constitutionally-Protected Fundamental Right Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
24
2017
Protecting Against Patent Trolls Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Aug
24
2017
PTAB on the Right Track in Ex parte MARK L. MORSCH, et. al. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
24
2017
Gartner: Worldwide Spending on Information Security to Reach $93 Billion in 2018 K&L Gates
Aug
24
2017
PTO Litigation Report – August 24, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
23
2017
In a Reversal, Federal Circuit Finds Data Processing Claims Patent-Eligible under Section 101 in Visual Memory v. NVIDIA Mintz
Aug
23
2017
Understanding Bolar and Bolar-Like Exceptions in the U.S. and Abroad – Part 2 – Canada Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins