Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Oct
10
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 10, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
10
2017
More Changes to the EU Trade Mark Regime Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
10
2017
Federal Circuit Questions Written Description For Antibody Claims Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
10
2017
Federal Circuit Rejects Requirement That Patent Owners Have the Burden to Prove the Patentability of Amended Claims Proffered During Inter Partes Review Proceedings Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
9
2017
Willful Infringement, Opinion Letters, & Post-Halo Trends Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
9
2017
General Plastic Industrial Co. v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha: PTAB Explains Factors Considers for Follow-On Petitions Mintz
Oct
8
2017
Does Explanatory Language on Your Specimen Make a Mark Descriptive? McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
8
2017
The Cheerios Challenge of Registering Color Marks McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
8
2017
On Your Mark—"TM" or "®"? Trademark Notice Guidelines Ward and Smith, P.A.
Oct
7
2017
Disclaimer of All Challenged Claims Results in Denial of IPR Institution McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
7
2017
Recovering Attorneys’ Fees Is Not a Snap McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
6
2017
Federal Circuit OK’s Use of Post-Priority-Date Evidence Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Oct
6
2017
In IPRs, Petitioner Must Show Claim Amendments Unpatentable Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Oct
6
2017
ALJ Shaw: ITC is a Viable Forum for Enforcement of SEPs Mintz
Oct
6
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 6, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
6
2017
Canada Institutes Certificates of Supplementary Protection for Approved Drug Products Mintz
Oct
6
2017
Federal Circuit’s Aqua Products Decision Clarifies Burden on IPR Petitioner to Challenge Amended Claims Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
6
2017
Jury Awards Profits for Infringing Sales in Post-Samsung Design Patent Case K&L Gates
Oct
5
2017
Sea Change in IPR or Just an SOS? – Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
5
2017
October 2017 Update- gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
5
2017
Positive Developments – EUTM Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
5
2017
AQUA PRODUCTS: The Federal Circuit Shifts The Burden of Proof On Amending Claims During An IPR From The Patent Owner To The Petitioner Mintz
Oct
5
2017
Beyond Mere Consent: It's All in the Details Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
5
2017
Notice of Appeal Divests PTAB of Jurisdiction McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
5
2017
Assignor Estoppel Is Not a Defense in IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
5
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 5, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
5
2017
ITC Refuses To Allow Limited Usage Of Protected Material In European Patent Proceedings; Calls For Granular Examination Of Public Interest Issues Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
5
2017
Petitioners Bear the Burden of Proving Invalidity of Amended Claims in IPR Proceedings K&L Gates
Oct
4
2017
Federal Circuit Concludes that PTAB Not Justified in Placing Burden of Persuasion on Patent Owners When They Seek to Amend Claims in Inter Partes Review Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
4
2017
CAFC Eases Amendment Process In IPR Proceedings Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
4
2017
The Restasis Patents and Tribal Sovereign Immunity: New Developments Polsinelli PC
Oct
4
2017
PTO Uses Different Approaches “Configured” to Assess Indefiniteness McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2017
Federal Circuit to Rehear Fee Shifting Decision En Banc McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2017
Government Agencies Have Standing to Petition for CBM Review McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2017
Respondent Has Standing in Appeal from PTAB McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins