Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Oct
31
2017
Arista Networks, Inc. v. International Trade Commission,: Limited Exclusion Order Does Not Require Specific Findings as to Components McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2017
First Data Corp. v. Inselberg: Ownership Dispute Strips Federal Circuit of Jurisdiction to Review McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2017
Allied Mineral Products, Inc. v. Osmi, Inc: Foreign Suit against Customers Insufficient Grounds for US Declaratory Judgment Action by Manufacturer McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Gold Standard Instruments v. US Endodontics: Insufficient Teaching Away Throws Cold Water on Heat-Treating Patent McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Intellectual Ventures LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC: Message Received: Direct Infringement of System Claim Requires Evidence of Use McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Failure to Propose Proper Hypothetical Claim Dooms Doctrine of Equivalents: Jang v. Boston Scientific Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Anticipated Acts of Infringement May Establish Venue for Hatch-Waxman McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Challenged Claims are Obvious Based on Patent Owners’ Prior Art: Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. v. SFC Co. Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Court Extinguishes Parties’ Motions to Strike in LED Patent Dispute Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
30
2017
Airtight Victory for RV Seal Supplier in Appeal to Overturn Dismissal: Lifetime Indus., Inc. v. Trim-Lok, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
PTAB Should Have Given Credit to Inventor Corroborating Evidence:  NFC Tech., LLC v. Joseph Matal, McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 30, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
30
2017
Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Is Not Broadest Possible Interpretation:  In re Smith Int’l, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Down to the Wire: Patentee Must Rebut Inherent Functionality of Prior Art McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
That’s How the Prima Facie Obviousness Cookie Crumbles McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
28
2017
Florida Now Follows New York to Find No Common Law Public Performance Right For Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
27
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 27, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
26
2017
PTAB Grants Rare Request for Additional Discovery In IPR Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
26
2017
Lawsuits Filed on the Same Day Regarding Amgen’s Avastin® Biosimilar Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Oct
26
2017
Residuals Clauses in IP Agreements and NDAs Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Oct
26
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 26, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
26
2017
To CDO Or Not To CDO: Commissioners At ITC Are Split McKool Smith
Oct
26
2017
R&H’s Processes for Preparing Emulsion Polymers with Improved Opacity Not Invalid over the Prior Art that Does Not Include a “Swelling Agent” Narrowly Construed by the PTAB Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
26
2017
International Protection fo Trademarks in Connection with Brand Expansion K&L Gates
Oct
26
2017
The Seventh Amendment Right to a Jury Trial Does Not Apply to Requests for Attorney’s Fees Under § 285 of the Patent Act Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
25
2017
Deadline Approaching: Action Required by December 31 To Avoid Losing DMCA Safe Harbor Protection Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2017
CAFC Upheld TTAB’s Decision to Deny Registration of a Mark Merely Descriptive of a Feature of Goods and Services Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
25
2017
Apple and Samsung Are Headed Back to the Court Room Mintz
Oct
25
2017
PTAB’s Adoption of Petitioner’s Arguments Regarding Modification of a Prior Art Reference Held Minimally Sufficient to Support its Obviousness Determination Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
25
2017
Decision on Attorney’s Fees Vacated and Remanded Because the District Court Used an Incorrect Standard and Made Multiple Errors Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
25
2017
Non-Profit Organization Appellee Described as Representing the Public Interest Not Excluded from Appearing in Court to Defend a PTAB Decision Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
25
2017
New York District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction Motion Sought Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Oct
25
2017
Trick or Troll: NPE Litigation Trends, SEPs, FRAND and the Internet of Things [Podcast] McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2017
Scope of Protection of Existing Trademarks Unaffected by IP Translator, says CJEU Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
24
2017
Controversial “Gripe Site” Protected (Again) by the Communications Decency Act and Defeats Novel Copyright Attack with Website “Browsewrap” License to User Generated Content Proskauer Rose LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins