Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Nov
24
2017
Australian Patent Office Considers Plausibility In A Test For Sufficiency K&L Gates
Nov
22
2017
Looking Beyond the Label for Inducement in Post-Launch Case McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
22
2017
Generic Defendants Shed No Tears after Winning Motion to Add Incorrect Inventorship Defense McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
22
2017
NJ Court Grants Exceptional Case Fees Based on Speculative Infringement Suit McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
22
2017
Key Considerations in Maximizing a Celebrity Brand Mintz
Nov
22
2017
Trademark Tarnish Proves Tough For Disney IMS Legal Strategies
Nov
21
2017
Updated USPTO Patent Fee Schedule Includes Significant Increases and Additions Ballard Spahr LLP
Nov
21
2017
PTO Litigation Report – November 21, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
20
2017
Federal Circuit Rules That Supreme Court Decision in TC Heartland Was a Change of Law Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
20
2017
PTO Litigation Report – November 20, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
20
2017
USPTO Patent Fees To Go Up January 2018 Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
17
2017
Artificial Intelligence: Expectations of the IT Department Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Nov
17
2017
PTAB Issues New Standard Operating Procedure Addressing Remands from Federal Circuit: The New Standards and How They May Affect Your Remand Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
17
2017
District Court Denies Motion to Stay Pending Supreme Court Decision in Oil States Mintz
Nov
17
2017
PTO Litigation Report – November 17, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
17
2017
Federal Circuit Evaluates Import of Factual Statements Made During BPCIA Pre-litigation Patent Dance Mintz
Nov
16
2017
Federal Circuit Confirms TC Heartland was a Change of Law Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Nov
16
2017
Federal Circuit Concludes that TC Heartland Was a Change in the Law, Reviving Venue Transfer Motions for Defendants Previously Held to Have Waived the Argument Mintz
Nov
16
2017
Giving Defendants a Second Chance: Failure to Assert Improper Venue Prior to TC Heartland is Not a Waiver Under the Federal Rules Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
16
2017
Federal Circuit Affirms Delaware Alice Decision Mintz
Nov
16
2017
Federal Circuit Holds TC Heartland Is an Intervening Change in the Law Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Nov
16
2017
Company “Branding” and the Benefits of Federal Trademark Registration Mintz
Nov
16
2017
Contracting parties should take notice of the latest interpretation ruling Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
16
2017
PTO Litigation Report – November 16, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
15
2017
Erectile Dysfunction Drug-Patent Found Obvious Hunton Andrews Kurth
Nov
15
2017
Federal Circuit Reverses Finding of Indefiniteness for Claiming Both an Apparatus and a Method Hunton Andrews Kurth
Nov
15
2017
A Deep Dive in Petition Filing Stats Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
15
2017
SAS Institute v. Matal, Supreme Court No. 16-969 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
15
2017
Aglets, Who Knew?  Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
15
2017
The Board Gives Section 325(d) Sharp Teeth—Part II – The Petitioner's Criticality to Selecting and Using The Right Prior Art Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
15
2017
PTO Litigation Report – November 15, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
14
2017
USPTO Publishes New Rule Governing Privilege for Patent Attorneys and Agents Mintz
Nov
14
2017
Statistics on the Backlog Problem and "Fast-Track" Options in Brazil Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
14
2017
Patent Claims Directed to Streaming Audio/Visual Data Service Found to Be Ineligible Subject Matter Under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Hunton Andrews Kurth
Nov
13
2017
PTO Litigation Report – November 13, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins