Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jan
5
2018
Avoiding Patent Exhaustion: Structuring Agreements in View of the Latest Jurisprudence Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Jan
5
2018
PTO Litigation Report – January 5, 2018 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
4
2018
PTO Litigation Report – January 4, 2018 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
4
2018
EU: Report Of The European Commission On The Enforcement Of Intellectual Property Rights K&L Gates
Jan
4
2018
The $93.4 Million Question: Can Patent-Holders Recover Profits Lost On Contracts To Be Performed Outside The U.S.? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
3
2018
PTO Litigation Report – January 3, 2018 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
3
2018
New Trial Ordered Where Jury’s Verdict Didn’t “Gel” Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
3
2018
Year in Review: The Most Popular Blog Posts of 2017 Mintz
Jan
2
2018
Defendants Waived Venue Challenge After Waiting Four Months After TC Heartland Decision to Move Mintz
Jan
2
2018
PTO Litigation Report – January 2, 2018 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
2
2018
New Year's Resolutions For The U.S. Patent System Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
29
2017
PTO Litigation Report – December 29, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
29
2017
USITC Denies Entry into Early Disposition Pilot Program for Three More Cases Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
28
2017
Reverse Engineered Podcast: Episode 11 | Part 1: Buy, Sell or Hodl: The Patent Side of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Technologies McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
28
2017
Anticipation Bounces Back Electronic Return Receipt Patent as Invalid Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
28
2017
PTO Litigation Report – December 28, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
28
2017
Assertion of Patents Results in Loss of Sovereign Immunity for Public Universities Mintz
Dec
27
2017
PTO Litigation Report – December 27, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
27
2017
Trademark Practice Update: Scandalous? Immoral? It's all Good Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
27
2017
Ultra Violet is the New Black Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
26
2017
Cesari S.R.L. v. Peju Province Winery L.P.: Relying on Supreme Court Precedent, District Court Holds that Trademark Trial & Appeal Board Finding of Likelihood of Confusion has Preclusive Effect Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
25
2017
When A Musical Misstep By Disney Means Millions, It’s Hard To "Let It Go!" IMS Legal Strategies
Dec
25
2017
Aqua Products Sinks PTAB Decision in Bosch v. Matal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
22
2017
European Commission Reminds Trademark Owners to Prepare for Brexit, Warning EU Protection May No Longer Extend to UK as of March 30, 2019 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Dec
22
2017
Empire Strikes Back: First Amendment Protects TV Series Title McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
22
2017
The Board Gives Section 325(d) Sharp Teeth—Part III —Things Are Looking Up for Patent Owners Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
22
2017
Presumption in Favor of Unmasking Copyright Infringers McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
22
2017
Newsletter Sent to US Customers Insufficient to Establish Personal Jurisdiction McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
22
2017
Winter Fest Trademark Fight Gets Frosty McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
22
2017
Two Federal Preemption Cases, One Consistent Outcome McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
22
2017
PTAB Explains Procedure for Handling Remand from Federal Circuit McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
22
2017
Looking Back: TC Heartland Is a Change of Law McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
22
2017
Discussion of Read Factors Not Mandatory for Enhanced Damages Determination McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
22
2017
Unclaimed Features Cannot Save Eligibility of Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
22
2017
Totality of Evidence Must Be Considered in Assessing Obviousness McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins