Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Mar
21
2018
In re Hodges, Appeal No. 2017-1434 (Fed. Cir. 2018) Brinks Gilson & Lione
Mar
21
2018
Is the "Food Court" Closing? Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
21
2018
Wide Range of U.S. Service Providers and IP Rights Holders Required to Respond to New Mandatory U.S. Government Survey Faegre Drinker
Mar
21
2018
Recent Decisions In Favor Of Patent Eligibility Focus On Factual Inquiries Brinks Gilson & Lione
Mar
20
2018
An Economic Test For Patent Eligibility? Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
19
2018
In re Urvashi Bhagat – The Slippery Slope of Natural Product Claims Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
15
2018
Next Up: Section 301 Companies and Global Markets Should Prepare for the Risk of Rising U.S.-China Trade Tensions Covington & Burling LLP
Mar
15
2018
USPTO Withdraws Newly Characterized Antigen Test For Written Description Of Antibodies Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
15
2018
Exergen Corp. v. Kaz USA Represents Another In A Recent String Of Recent Setbacks For Patent Infringement Defendants On Eligibility Challenges Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
14
2018
Exergen Corp. v. Kaz USA, Inc. – A Crack in the Patent Eligibility of Diagnostic Claims? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
14
2018
USPTO Pilots Program to Challenge Doctored Specimens Ballard Spahr LLP
Mar
14
2018
Unique Venue and Personal Jurisdiction Challenges of Foreign Corporations Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
13
2018
Thunder Road Toasts Success in "Pacific Ale" Case Again (Stone & Wood's Appeal Dismissed) K&L Gates
Mar
13
2018
Texas Supreme Court Holds Patent Agent Communications May Be Privileged Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
12
2018
Blockchain Technology May Help Artists with Copyright Protection PracticePanther
Mar
12
2018
Berkheimer v. HP Inc.: Whether Claim Elements Are Well-Known, Routine, or Conventional Is a Question of Fact Mintz
Mar
12
2018
When Your Rebranding Gets “Stone”-Walled Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Mar
9
2018
Proposed Trademark Classes for Cannabis-Related Marks in Doubt as California Allows Registration under Existing Classes Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Mar
9
2018
Understanding The “Twice Rejected” Rule For Initiating An Appeal With The Patent Trial And Appeal Board Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
7
2018
Cold to Mootness Challenge, But Warm to Inequitable Conduct Defenses Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
7
2018
Federal Circuit Rejects Appeal of Walker Process Claim Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
6
2018
Alexander Graham Bell Day Calls for Patent Trivia: Time to See How "Phone Smart" You Are IMS Legal Strategies
Mar
5
2018
Automated Tracking Solutions, LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company Mintz
Mar
4
2018
Complex Claim Construction Issues in Knowles Electronics v. Cirrus Logic Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
4
2018
Enforce Your Intellectual Property or Risk Losing It Varnum LLP
Mar
2
2018
“Love” Is Not Enough for Trademark Confusion: Marilyn D. Mintz v. Subaru of America, Inc McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2018
Ninth Circuit Dishes Out Food for Thought on Summary Judgment McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2018
An Uphill Battle Protecting Fashion Designs In Nigeria and Abroad Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2018
A Vibration Dampener Fails Mayo/Alice Test in D. Delaware – Is the Decision as Shaky as it Seems? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
2
2018
Discovery Misconduct Can Cost More Than Just Your Case McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2018
Rejecting Trademarks and Exclusive Distribution Rights in Bankruptcy McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2018
Distinguishing “Expressly Aimed” Conduct from a “Substantial Connection” McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2018
Scraping Is OK, Copying Proprietary Software Is Not McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2018
No “Happy Together” Ending for Common Law Public Performance Rights in Florida McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2018
Self-Help CIP Doesn’t Give Rise to § 121 Safe Harbor McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins