Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Mar
28
2018
Activity Outside Licensed “Field of Use” Not a Material Breach McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Deference, Discovery and District Court Findings McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Counting the Days: PTA Calculated from Date National Stage Commences McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Doctrine of “Ancillary Venue” Does Not Trump TC Heartland Mintz
Mar
28
2018
PTO Clarifies Written Description Guidance for Claims Drawn to Antibodies McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Incorporation by Reference: Context May Affect Written Description Support for Later-Added Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Recent PTAB Studies: Expanded Panels and Orange Book-Listed Patents Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
28
2018
Knee Brace Patent Application Gets a Leg Up McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Zazzle And Other Print-On-Demand Websites Can Breathe A Sigh Of Relief . . . For Now Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
28
2018
Examiner’s Reason for Allowance May Be Sufficient to Show Prosecution Disclaimer McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Federal Circuit’s “Only Permissible Finding” Is to Reverse PTAB McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Distribution Agreement Qualifies as Commercial Offer for Sale McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Substantial Evidence Supports Non-Obviousness in Helmet Case McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Subjective Preference Is No Excuse for Ignoring Teaching Away McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Escaping Summary Judgment Under § 101 McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Complaint Sheltered From Dismissal In Patent Row Over Personal Tents Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
27
2018
Case to Watch: Goldman v. Breitbart, involving embedded Tweets of Tom Brady recruiting Kevin Durant in the Hamptons Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
27
2018
Implications for Chinese Investment in the US After Section 301 Report Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
27
2018
UPDATE: The Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act vs. The California Uniform Trade Secrets Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
27
2018
Federal Circuit Finds Composition of Matter Ineligible For Patenting Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
26
2018
BLURRED LINES: Bringing Focus to the 9th Circuit’s Copyright Decision In Williams v. Gaye Brinks Gilson & Lione
Mar
26
2018
The Public Interest, EPROMs, and Domestic Industry Issues in Component Manufacturer S. 337 Investigations Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
26
2018
Pre-Enactment Conduct Does Not Bar Relief Under Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act for Continuing Acts of Misappropriation Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
26
2018
Gearing Up for the Impact of Section 301 Trade Remedies Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
26
2018
A Split Panel of the Federal Circuit Reverses PTAB Finding of Unpatentability Without Remand in DSS v. Apple Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
25
2018
The Important Distinction In Patent Examination Practice Between Precedential and Non-Precedential Federal Circuit Decisions On Subject Matter Eligibility Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
24
2018
Ex parte Bhogal and Ex parte Hoff: PTAB raises burden on USPTO to justify 101 rejections Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
23
2018
TCL v. Ericsson: Determining FRAND Royalty Rates in SEP Licensing Brinks Gilson & Lione
Mar
22
2018
Subject Matter Eligibility and Questions of Fact Brinks Gilson & Lione
Mar
22
2018
Cornerstone To An International Intellectual Property Protection Center Brinks Gilson & Lione
Mar
22
2018
Time to Appeal: Challenging PTAB Time-Bar Determinations at the Federal Circuit Brinks Gilson & Lione
Mar
22
2018
Janssen Biotech Unable To Rewrite History and Save Remicade Patent Brinks Gilson & Lione
Mar
21
2018
Subject Matter Eligibility for Graphical User Interfaces: Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L.. v. LG Electronics, Inc Brinks Gilson & Lione
Mar
21
2018
PTAB Denies Request for Institution of Post-Grant Review in "Live Nation Entertainment" Case Brinks Gilson & Lione
Mar
21
2018
Are Foreign Lost Profits Really Lost? Brinks Gilson & Lione
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins