Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Sep
18
2018
Ohio State and Oklahoma Battle It Out Again (Just Not On The Football Field) Brinks Gilson & Lione
Sep
18
2018
4 Tips to Protect Trade Secrets and Confidential Information When Terminating Employees Polsinelli PC
Sep
18
2018
Federal Circuit Outlines Four Options For Overcoming Obviousness Rejections Based On Routine Optimization Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
15
2018
PTAB Reverses 101 Rejection on Authentication Invention for MasterCard Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
14
2018
Ex parte Parenteau – PTAB Skips Step One of the Mayo/Alice Test? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
13
2018
RPX Requests en banc Review in Applications in Internet Time v. RPX Mintz
Sep
13
2018
Ex parte Ho – Burden Shifting in s.101 Rejections Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
12
2018
Court Disqualifies Law Firm in Patent Suit, Finding No Quick Fix for Rule 1.7 Violation Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
11
2018
Challenging IPR Institutions Following Federal Court Decision in In re: Power Integrations Inc. Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
11
2018
False Food Advertising Claims Require Plausibility, Not Possibility Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
11
2018
PTAB Denies Institution of IPR after Successive Petitions by Unrelated Co-Defendants Mintz
Sep
11
2018
Comparative Advertising: A Quick Guide Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
10
2018
Bhagat v. Iancu – Did the Myriad Decision Overrule Funk Bros.? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
10
2018
Federal Circuit Holds that the Petitioner Bears the Burden to Show All Real Parties in Interest are Properly Named in a Petition for IPR Mintz
Sep
6
2018
Massachusetts Adopts Uniform Trade Secrets Act Mintz
Sep
4
2018
In re: Maatita: The Federal Circuit Adds a New Dimension to the Design Patent Indefiniteness Standard Brinks Gilson & Lione
Sep
4
2018
Not Just For Crypto – How Blockchain Technology Will Affect Medical Devices Mintz
Sep
1
2018
Not A Dry Eye In The House: Federal Circuit Thwarts Drug Company’s Attempt To Avoid Inter Partes Review IMS Legal Strategies
Aug
31
2018
New Parallel Importation Laws in Australia K&L Gates
Aug
30
2018
Entire Market Value Rule: Patented Feature Must Be Sole Driver for Consumer Demand McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2018
USPTO Offers Refund of Certain Non-Electronic Filing Fees Incurred During DSUEBSO Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
30
2018
Claims Not Limited to Unrecited Aspect Unless the Intrinsic Record Shows Criticality McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2018
Exploring the Waters of Motivation to Combine and Secondary Considerations: ZUP, LLC v. Nash Manufacturing, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2018
CJEU Issues Landmark Decision on Patent Term Extensions for Medicinal Products McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2018
Tread Lightly: Tire Company’s Use of Competitor’s Mold Is Reverse Passing Off: OTR Wheel Eng’g v. West Worldwide Servs. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2018
The Public’s Right to Know: American Society for Testing and Materials, et al. v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2018
Copyright in Data Compilations Is Thin: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. v. Nationwide Marketing Services Incorporated McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2018
Yo Ho No: Lack of Express Language Scuttles Claim of Sovereign Immunity Waiver McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2018
Defendant Did Not Prevail Under Texas Statute Where Case Was Decided Under California Law McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2018
Obviousness Cannot Be Predicated on What Is Unknown McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2018
Walk Carefully at This Intersection: Willful Infringement ≠ Enhanced Damages McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2018
Specification Must Enable Full Scope of Claims as Construed McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2018
Attention Please: Still Looking for Predictable Rules to Determine Subject Matter Eligibility McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2018
Printed Publication Status Based on Public Accessibility McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2018
When SCOTUS Said No Partial Institution, It Meant All Challenged Grounds McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins