Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Oct
9
2019
CBP Seizes Over $2.2 Million worth of Fake Nike Shoes at LA/Long Beach Seaport U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Oct
9
2019
Don’t B Late; Federal Circuit Interprets The B Delay Calculation K&L Gates
Oct
8
2019
USPTO to Tweak PTA Rules in View of Supernus Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
7
2019
Today’s Special: Validity Goulash – Serving Up 101 in the Mechanical Arts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
7
2019
Ostriches Beware: Hiding Head in the Sand Causes Willful Blindness in Patent Infringement Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
7
2019
Ex parte WILHELM HEINE: PTAB Rejects Examiner’s Unreasonable Claim Construction Mintz
Oct
3
2019
District of Rhode Island Dismisses In-House Attorney’s SOX Whistleblower Claim for Lack of Protected Activity Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
1
2019
PTAB Precedential 35 U.S.C. 315(b) Decisions Show Service in Dismissed Infringement Cases Can Still Bar IPR Institution Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
1
2019
A Patent-Eligible Diagnostic Method Claim Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
30
2019
Don't Let Your Employees Trade Your Trade Secrets Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
30
2019
Patenting Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Biotech and Synthetic Biology Mintz
Sep
27
2019
Nothing Exceptional About Litigation Costs Exceeding Potential Damages McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
27
2019
Equivalent Disclosure Used To Satisfy Written Description Requirement McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
27
2019
When Is “Wherein” Clause Limiting? When It’s Material To Patentability McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
27
2019
Sharp Turnaround On Applicability Of § 112, ¶6 Analysis McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
27
2019
When is Batting "Lofty"? Look to the Specification McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
27
2019
No Concrete Controversy if there are No Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
27
2019
A Decision on Appeal is Final . . . Mostly McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
27
2019
“Tangential Relation" Exception Saves Patentee's Reliance on DOE McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
25
2019
After-Final Response Does Not Stop PTA Clock Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
24
2019
Prior Civil Action Bars IPR - A Precedential Decision Mintz
Sep
23
2019
ITC suggests 5% Threshold for Domestic Industry Assessment; Order May Impact Tech Companies Mintz
Sep
20
2019
Echoes of Roseanne Roseannadanna: It’s always something—Federal Judge Dismisses Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Involving Gilda Radner Documentary Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
19
2019
Driver’s License: Copyright Infringement in the World of Street Art Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
18
2019
RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
17
2019
Recap of Federal Register Notice on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Patent Issues Mintz
Sep
16
2019
Perils of Waiting: PTAB’s Precedential Opinion Panel Designates Two More Decisions Rejecting 315(b) Arguments Regarding Time Bars Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
16
2019
Federal Circuit Limits Design Patents to Identified Article of Manufacture Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
16
2019
Senate Subcommittee on IP Holds Hearings on SWOT of STRONGER Bill Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
13
2019
District Court Sheds Light on Scope of IPR Estoppel Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
12
2019
Fluid Trademarks: Will Companies Go With the Flow? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
11
2019
EPA Seeks Comment on its Risk Assessment Methodology for Evaluating Potential Synergistic Effects of Pesticides on Non-Target Organisms Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
Sep
11
2019
Claim Construction Disputes Must Be Decided Before Applying Alice Brinks Gilson & Lione
Sep
11
2019
Trade Mark Re-filing And Bad Faith – Go Directly To Jail. Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect $200 K&L Gates
Sep
10
2019
Personalized Therapy Patent Falls as Patent-Ineligible Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins