Recent White Collar Crime, Consumer Rights, & Civil Rights Updates

Custom text Organization
Aug
19
2012
The Sixth Circuit rules on the deadline for completing action on a CAFA appeal and whether a third-party defendant may remove under CAFA Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
19
2012
Indiana Plaintiff Defeats Legitimate Nondiscriminatory Reason Defense Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
19
2012
Puyallup Truck Dealership Sued by EEOC for National Origin and Sexual Harassment U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Aug
18
2012
The Second Circuit affirms denial of remand in a CAFA case where the plaintiff failed to raise a procedural defect in the notice of removal in a timely manner Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
17
2012
Magnetics International to Pay $30,000 To Settle EEOC Religious Discrimination Suit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Aug
17
2012
The Ninth Circuit finds that the removing defendant met its evidentiary burden by proving the CAFA amount in controversy to a legal certainty Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
17
2012
Executive’s Internet Searches Give SEC the Road Map to Make an Arrest Ifrah Law
Aug
17
2012
New Jersey Appellate Court “Renews” Recommendation that Model Jury Charge For Failure-to-Accommodate Cases Is Needed Faegre Drinker
Aug
17
2012
Hawaii Electric Company to Pay $50,000 to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Suit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Aug
16
2012
Right Is Simple Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
16
2012
Court Catches Unsuspecting Policyholder in Property Insurance Traps Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Aug
16
2012
Northern District of Illinois Holds that Plaintiffs’ Proposal of a Consolidated Trial May Trigger Federal Jurisdiction Under CAFA as a Mass Action Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
15
2012
JES/Genie Temps to Pay $80,000 to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Suit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Aug
15
2012
Retail Did You Know? Retailers Under New Pressure Regarding Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Aug
15
2012
Third Circuit vacates order granting the defendant leave to appeal an order remanding a class action case to state court where post-remand the state court dismissed the case Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
15
2012
FTC Signals Intent to Pursue Monetary Equitable Remedies More Aggressively Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Aug
15
2012
Federal district court in NY holds CAFA’s Home State Exception is not jurisdictional, and CAFA imposes no deadline for raising the exception when an action is originally filed in federal court Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
14
2012
Second Circuit Expands the Scope of SEC Aiding and Abetting Claims Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
14
2012
Eighth Circuit affirms denial of remand in a case where the plaintiff attempted to challenge the court’s CAFA jurisdiction based on an amended complaint filed after removal Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
14
2012
Maximus Will Pay $50,000 to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Lawsuit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Aug
14
2012
Ninth Circuit reverses a remand order where the district court erroneously refused to consider jurisdictional evidence submitted by the removing party Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
13
2012
The Seventh Circuit holds that 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(9) relating to securities class actions is an exception to CAFA jurisdiction, not a prerequisite Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
13
2012
The Eighth Circuit holds that stipulations filed contemporaneously with a complaint limiting damages to an amount below CAFA’s jurisdictional threshold may be used to defeat CAFA jurisdiction Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
12
2012
The Ninth Circuit Finds in a Recent Parens Patriae Action that the Case is 99 Persons Short of a Mass Action under CAFA Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
12
2012
False Claims Act Case Questioning Quality of Laboratory Services Unsealed in New Mexico Mintz
Aug
11
2012
EEOC General Counsel Discusses Drop in Systemic Case Filings, Announces New Priorities Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
11
2012
An Arkansas District Court Holds That a Stipulation as to the Amount in Controversy Contained in the Body of the Complaint is Sufficient to Defeat CAFA Jurisdiction Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
10
2012
The Seventh Circuit Examines CAFA Amount in Controversy Evidence under the Legally Impossible Standard Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.

 

Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters